0
\$\begingroup\$

My party is on borrowed mounts for a flying hunt. Unbeknownst to them, the "hosts" are aware of them as antagonists. I intend to have the hosts tell the flying mounts to dismount the party when they are some 50 feet up. I know from the PHB that forced movement of a mount calls for a DC 10 DEX check. I am just wondering if anyone might have some house rules that could spice things up a bit.

\$\endgroup\$
3
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Can you clarify what sorts of houserules would work well or poorly for your group? Are you looking for a minor inconvenience to an experienced party, or a potentially serious distraction, or what? \$\endgroup\$
    – user17995
    Aug 28, 2015 at 20:17
  • \$\begingroup\$ This seems kind of similar to the Obsidian Steed, one of the Figurines of Wondrous Power. \$\endgroup\$
    – Javelin
    Aug 28, 2015 at 21:46
  • \$\begingroup\$ What kind of rules, to spice things up how? It's not clear what you're looking for, and unlike a forum, we only field specific questions rather than "just give me some ideas" questions. \$\endgroup\$ Aug 28, 2015 at 23:14

3 Answers 3

5
\$\begingroup\$

If there are saddles involved I would keep the DC 10 Dex check. If there are no saddles then I would go up a level of difficulty with a DC 15 Dex check.

As couple of points

  • Start off by describing the mounts going crazy in the air and the party making DEX Check.
  • If you feel generous make a secret Insight check for individual members to notice their mounts seem tense. Often when people are about to execute a betrayal they reveal a 'tell' that would give away that something is going down. The DC of the check would be based on how difficult you judge the characters being able to read the mount's mood.
  • Likely it will take the players a round or two figure out that something really adnormal is going on. Since this is all done verbally give them a few extra moments for the first few rounds to talk and figure out stuff. Then crank it up after round 3 or 4 by giving them limited time to declare their actions before making the next DEX check.

What going to be critical is how you pace the out of game time cycle of players decision and DEX check. Too long and it is not really a challenge, too short they will think it is unfair.

\$\endgroup\$
2
\$\begingroup\$

Personally, I would use the shove rules for this. The mount is trying to throw the players off, while the players are trying to stop that. The creatures roll their strength (athletics), which the players counter with either strength (athletics) for holding on through sheer strength, or dexterity (acrobatics).

If you want to warn the players, you could roll deception against their passive insight. The reason you're using passive insight is because they didn't specifically ask a question that could be solved with a roll, and are not actively suspicious.

\$\endgroup\$
-2
\$\begingroup\$

Applicable rules

There is no need for house rules; the RAW cover this, albeit very harshly.

A willing creature ... can serve as a mount

The creature is not willing, therefore you fall off.

Furthermore, the PHB also says:

If your mount is knocked prone, you can use your reaction to dismount it as it falls and land on your feet. Otherwise, you are dismounted and fall prone in a space within 5 feet it.

The creature can fall prone as part of its movement, therefore you are dismounted.

How I would handle it

  1. Check for surprise, mount's Charisma (Deception) vs character's passive Wisdom (Perception)
  2. Roll initiative, characters who are not surprised and beat their mount's initiative can use an attack to start a grapple.
  3. On the mount's turn it:
    1. attempts to break any grapple, and
    2. falls prone; characters who have not grappled fall off.
\$\endgroup\$
2
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ the creature no longer being a valid mount doesn't mean you fall off. It just means it's not a mount anymore. Climbing giant hostile creatures to kill them ala Shadow of the Colossus is still valid, and probably still a Dex check. \$\endgroup\$ Aug 28, 2015 at 22:20
  • \$\begingroup\$ @thedarkwanderer that is why I have suggested the grapple in order to hold onto the creature, in my opinion this is the appropriate mechanism. There is no suggestion that the mount's in question are the size of the colossi in the video game you mention. \$\endgroup\$
    – Dale M
    Aug 29, 2015 at 8:26

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .