Role-playing Games Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for gamemasters and players of tabletop, paper-and-pencil role-playing games. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

The d20srd states, under Damage Reduction:

Some monsters are vulnerable to magic weapons. Any weapon with at least a +1 magical enhancement bonus on attack and damage rolls overcomes the damage reduction of these monsters. Such creatures’ natural weapons (but not their attacks with weapons) are treated as magic weapons for the purpose of overcoming damage reduction.

Does this mean that practically no other creatures' natural weapons count as magical for the purpose of overcoming damage reduction: X/magic, only that of those who explicitly have damage reduction: X/magic?

share|improve this question
up vote 6 down vote accepted

That is correct. Earlier - 2e maybe?- monsters counted as "+X" by virtue of high hit dice, but this is no longer the case. Of course, that's why DR was softened from a flat "+1 or better to hit" to just reduction of damage.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.