Tell me more ×
Role-playing Games Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for gamemasters and players of tabletop, paper-and-pencil role-playing games. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I've frequently heard the Basic Role-play system and Dark Heresy described as deadly from a combat perspective. I think those are both percentile systems. Is that typical of percentile systems or is there something statistically more dangerous?

share|improve this question
4  
The lethality of Dark Heresy is clearly a conspiracy instigated by Slaneesh as a favour to Khorne. – Brian Ballsun-Stanton Feb 26 '12 at 19:57
Welcome to the site, can you clarify what you mean by "brutal"? – C. Ross Feb 26 '12 at 21:48
@Ross I mean deadly. – user3160 Feb 26 '12 at 21:56
I should note that my answers is a simplification, but I think it conveys my point. – Canageek Feb 26 '12 at 22:24

6 Answers

up vote 16 down vote accepted

BRP is "deadly" mostly because the damage capacity is relatively low (Size+Con)/2, averaging 11 points, and damages are a significant portion of that. Weapons range from 1d4 (dagger) through 2d8 (Greatsword) damage, before accounting for damage by location limits and impaling... and head hits can only take 1/3 the total. Quite simply put, a single hit in the head with any weapon has the potential to kill the average character. Even the toughest humans only have 6 HP in the head. All damage to locations is also marked against total hit points. And a Critical hit bypasses any worn armor, and does maximum damage. If head or chest are depleted, dead. If total hit points are depleted, death also occurs.

Dark Heresy is far less deadly. Wounds starts between 8 and 15, most weapons do 1d10 to 1d10+5, tho' some exceed 3d10, and running out of Wounds points doesn't kill. (In fact, one has to go at least -7 to stand a chance of death.) Further, the first 2-5 points won't count, as the individual's Toughness Bonus will be subtracted. There are no location hit points, only the general pool; the location hit determines the effects of being negative and which armor applies. Most characters can survive even a full burst from most weapons.

Lethality is more a function of damage mechanics and the ratio of damage capacity to damage done than skill mechanics.

pre 4E D&D, when played at low levels (1-2), is as deadly as BRP. Weapon damages up to 2d10, Hit points of 1-14 at 1st level, and as many again each level thereafter... with only 4-8 per level being typical. (Far less for wizards.) And, as written, death when below zero.

At high levels, that means hit point totals up to 150 HP... but damages don't go up.

So, at low levels, D&D is deadly. At high levels, it's not. And in between, it gets less so with every level.

share|improve this answer

No, this is not an inherent trait of d% systems, but a result of the exact mechanics. BRP is descended from RuneQuest, which was designed to be more realistic than D&D: Thus, characters only have a few hit points. It has also been used for games such as the Call of Cthulhu, which value players being unable to always fight their way out of situations.

Similarly, Dark Heresy is designed to have you play as the low powered pawns of the Inquisitors, and thus likely wants a brutal combat system. (I suspect if you go to Deathwatch then you will have a significantly less brutal game, though I have no experience with the line.)

You can demonstrate that with no modifiers a d% is equivalent to a d20 (1 in 20 = 5%, proof left as exercise). You could actually work out the % of any roll in D&D and use d% to roll it if you felt like it. Therefore, there is no mathematical reason that d% games have to be more lethal; it is just that the most popular games to use that system happen to be quite lethal.

The real reason BRP is so lethal (I can't speak to Dark Heresy as I haven't played it, but I know BRP rather well) is that it is very easy to get good with weapons but your hit points never rise. So characters will very quickly get quite good at inflicting damage, as will their foes, but they never get better at absorbing it (or only do so slowly, as they get better armour). They do get better at dodging attacks (Dodge and Parry), however if you do get hit you aren't any better at absorbing it. If your HP rose as you gained gained in power, as you do in D&D (the 'baseline' system) then BRP would not be any more lethal then D&D.

(I'm ignoring major wound and hit locations as they are different in each implementation of the system, and are thus demonstrably a part of the individual system and not a trait of using a d% as the base die type.)

share|improve this answer
Small nit: BRP is a descendant of RuneQuest. HeroQuest came along a bit later. – Erik Schmidt Feb 27 '12 at 19:19
@ErikSchmidt Right you are: Heroquest is a boardgame sitting in my cupboard. I've fixed that mistake. – Canageek Feb 27 '12 at 23:31
@ErikSchmidt ACtually, BRP has been used often as a clade reference to all %ile games from Chaosium, including the original BRP and RQ 2 & 3, Elf Quest, Ringworld, CoC, Stormbringer, Hawkmoon, Elrick and even the non-Chaosium Worlds Beyond. – aramis Feb 28 '12 at 4:58
@aramis- Indeed, BRP became the reference for Chaosium's d100 games, but RuneQuest was born in 1978. The original skimpy BRP arrived in 1980 and was included as a staple-bound add-in to the boxed version of Chaosium's RQ 2. – Erik Schmidt Feb 28 '12 at 20:07
@aramis Here is a bit of its history: rdushay.home.mindspring.com/Museum/Fantasy/RQrevw.html – Canageek Feb 28 '12 at 23:54
show 3 more comments

Paranoia is the highest lethality game that I know of: dying and activating your next clone is one of its tropes, critically failing a single roll is likely to get you killed, and dying multiple times in a single session is common. It's a d20, roll-under system, not percentile.

share|improve this answer
What type of dice are in play? – user3160 Feb 26 '12 at 23:06
7  
The "correct" answer to your question, user, is "I'm sorry, citizen, you're not cleared for that information." :) – Brian Ballsun-Stanton Feb 27 '12 at 3:45
4  
@okeefe Citizen O'keefe, report for disintegration for failure to verify user13095 having ultraviolet clearance. Have a nice day! – aramis Feb 28 '12 at 4:49
4  
Citizen okeefe-RPG-2 here, reporting for duty. Pity about what happen to okeefe-RPG-1... – okeefe Feb 28 '12 at 5:13
1  
The original perfect 1st edition Paranoia system was a % system and much more cludgy and awkward, with rules for multi-colour reflec and skill trees and so on; in the even more perfect 2nd edition system it was streamlined down to fast-and-dirty d20 system that now exists. – Rob Oct 29 '12 at 12:04
show 2 more comments

The Riddle of Steel by Jacob Norwood and Driftwood Publishing. May be out of print currently.

The game is inspired by the Conan stories, and the system is intended to emulate medieval combat plus wicked awesome sorcery. Supposedly the guys who designed the game actually know how to use swords and armor and based its combat system around this knowledge.

Combat is brutal, but is also tactical – in a fight between two fairly matched combatants you can still have someone dead at the end of round 1 if a poor choice is made, or the dice are not in someone's favor.

Sorcery is just ridiculous – and I mean awesome. It uses the old dark medieval association that sorcerers are not to be trifled with, so think of Merlin and Gandalf and Belgarath, not Fumbles the 1st Level Wizard. No magic missiles here, just vagaries, which define how sorcerers can impact their targets.

share|improve this answer
In my experience, Spiritual Attributes (basically huge floating bonuses for doing things in pursuit of your character's passions) kinda wreck a lot of the tactical/simulational aspects of the combat system, though. – Alex P Jun 21 '12 at 16:49

This isn't system inherent, it's really based on the setting.

For instance, in Eclipse Phase it's totally possible to have mostly non-lethal combats with no real chance for any side to do major damage, and it's a percentile-based system. Doesn't mean that it's less deadly, but the combat's quicker.

share|improve this answer
Actually I find fast systems = more lethal: Combat in say, Call of Cthulhu is way more lethal then say, 3e through 4e D&D, and is also far faster. GURPS combat is way more crunchy then D&D, but you only get a couple shots before you kneel over. – Canageek Feb 27 '12 at 1:58
1  
System mechanics are usually more important than setting. Especially since many games settings and rules are somewhat disconnected. – aramis Feb 28 '12 at 4:59
Yes, but the systems themselves don't determine this, it's how they're played. If you make a variant of D&D where the largest hit-die is d2 or d4, you don't necessarily keel over quicker, though if the weapon damages are kept the same you would. This is a setting change, not a system change, because it is a deliberate attempt to change the feel of the game rather than how it is played. – Kyle Willey Feb 28 '12 at 14:24
3  
@KyleWilley It is a system change, you mod the system and how it works, not the setting. Forgotten Realms could be played with basic dnd rules or the mod you proposed, they would still be Forgotten Realms. A setting is a set world or multiverse with set history, places and important people. It is set fluff, not mechanics. Mechanics are a part of the game system, if not whole the game system. – Khaal Feb 29 '12 at 1:14
Arguably- I'd say that some of the mechanics fall more under setting than system. For instance, if a designer said that combat should be deadly, that's not necessarily a system decision but rather a setting one. I don't believe changing a couple of arbitrary numbers equates to a system being different. – Kyle Willey Feb 29 '12 at 4:34
show 2 more comments

A system that I have found to have a high mortality rate (pending certain basics) is L5R. Thanks to the fact that it works with a "Hit Point" type health system, and the "exploding dice" mechanic (it's a d10 system, where if a 10 is rolled, another die is added to that die's total until it stops rolling tens) lends towards no upper limit of damage other than that 10-X chance you'll explode again. In the beginning stages of the game, a character might have only 32 "wounds" before they are dead, and even a non-kill gives that character penalties. The basic katana has a base of rolling five dice and keeping the highest two (keeping in mind that all 'explosions' based in a given die count as part of that die). In short, unless certain precautions are taken, builds that are not combat/damage driven can be quite terminal.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.