Take the 2-minute tour ×
Role-playing Games Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for gamemasters and players of tabletop, paper-and-pencil role-playing games. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I was teaching a game of Microscope today and I kept seeing references to light and dark. While expressing the tone of periods, events, and scenes is good, I remember from the playtest that a parent element's lightness or darkness somehow contributed to its children's tones.

In Microscope, how are the markers of Light and Dark used?

share|improve this question

2 Answers 2

up vote 25 down vote accepted
+100

Light and dark tones now have no mechanical effect - there are no counters or direct effects on other cards. The descriptive / storytelling effect is the whole of the point.

(I almost wrote 'only a descriptive effect', but in Microscope there's nothing 'only' about description. Tone is very important; try playing without it and you'll see the difference pretty quickly. Tone generates discussions of expectations about the period, and thereby helps the group achieve a shared vision of the history.)


For the curious, here's the play-test history you're thinking of and why it was changed:

You're correct that the Tone rules are the only survivors from earlier versions in which they provided mechanical enforcement.

Originally, light and dark counters on the cards were used to track 'tone debt'. I suspect you're thinking of the v3 playtest, in which tone debt was tracked separately with light/dark tone counters on each card in the timeline.

The contribution of a parent to its children's tones worked by giving tone debt to children that didn't fit. For example, placing a dark Scene in a light Period would call for the placement of an additional light tone debt counter, to reflect that the overall tone should drift a little back towards light.

Tone debt could then be invoked to take control of scenes in additional ways. That light tone debt could be 'called in' by a player to take over an NPC or other player's PC, establish new facts that changed the scene, or 'predict' an enforceable outcome of events - as long as this made the outcome more light. Thus, scenes in children were given a tendency towards the tone of the parent.

In v4, these rules became simpler, more abstract and smoother in use. Tone debt (now renamed 'Drama') sat only on Periods, and could be used for any scene in the period. Crucially, however, the 'finger voting' rules were introduced. Initially these were a conflict-resolution system for use of Drama. Instead of giving you enforced control of an outcome or fact, spending a Drama let you propose a light/dark fact or outcome, to be resolved by finger-vote.

And those rules turned out to make the concept of tone debt/drama counters obsolete.

The useful gameplay and conflict resolution functions were being handled by the finger voting. The old ability to predict/enforce scene ends in advance simply became unnecessary, because there's now a way to guide scenes to that end with a Push. And limiting a player's ability to introduce facts and control NPCs was no longer useful; instead of adding extra powers, Drama increasingly became a supply-of-counters limit on a something that players should be able to do all the time. The remaining value of tone was to force the players to discuss the meaning of the history - which is accomplished by the act of deciding the tone, and not aided by tone debt enforcement in scenes.

So the Drama rules were eventually transmuted into the Push rules, which have the same function but don't require you to put counters on the board first. (The Legacies were also heavily revised, as they tied in with that system.)

For more on these reasons, see the author's post looking back on the changes.

share|improve this answer

The light and dark markers don't dictate the children's tones, but they do provide general guidelines about how to rule on the Tone of the nested Events/Scenes if you can't decide:

"If the Scene doesn't seem particularly Light or Dark, judge the scene to be the opposite Tone of the surrounding Event--the Scene failed to live up to the expected Tone of the Event."

This principle is mentioned once or twice throughout the corebook, but I believe that is the only effect the Tones have on their nested elements.

share|improve this answer
    
I guess this flipping could be explained as "While this is a dark period in time, this event repressents a brief period of (comparative) lightness" –  Oxinabox Oct 30 at 4:01

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.