Take the 2-minute tour ×
Role-playing Games Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for gamemasters and players of tabletop, paper-and-pencil role-playing games. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I'm new to DM'ing and have an issue I'm not sure how to deal with. The situation is this: It's pitch black outside and the PC is walking, with a lantern in hand, toward a building. A bird is perched atop the building, watching the PC. The bird is not attempting to hide in any way, but it's also not moving/squawking/drawing attention to itself.

I'm trying to figure out if the PC perceives the bird. If I blatantly ask the PC to roll a perception check, he'll realize there's something worth perceiving and just sit out there rolling until he sees the bird.

The question is, how do I roll against the PC's passive perception? This might seem exceptionally basic for experienced GMs, but I really don't know the mechanics of it. The PC has a passive perception of 17. Do I just roll a d20 against that with no bonuses? That seems too simple. The bird has no stats.

Any advice is appreciated. Thanks.

share|improve this question
    
I'm not sure if you're looking for help on knowing what the target number for a passive check against a non-statt-ed out thing is, or if you're looking for help with playing out the scene you have set. –  Simon Withers May 2 '12 at 1:39
2  
@Lechlerfan Just to clarify on passive perception - You don't roll against it. You pick a DC (easy, medium or hard for the PC level) and if their passive perception meets or exceeds that DC, they succeed. Otherwise, they fail. There is no rolling until the player declares active perception. –  dpatchery May 2 '12 at 12:11
    
@BrianBallsun-Stanton You are correct if someone is actively hiding from you. I was referring to the generic "something is there but not immediately obvious, do you notice it without trying?" situation. –  dpatchery May 2 '12 at 12:22
1  
@BrianBallsun-Stanton I think it's reasonable to think of the bird less as a creature and more as a piece of set-dressing in this circumstance. The bird isn't a monster — it's a detail worth discovering. Figuring a Stealth score for it isn't worth the time; set a DC and move on. –  Jadasc May 2 '12 at 12:32
add comment

7 Answers

up vote 19 down vote accepted

In and of itself, a bird on a roof is not something out of the ordinary, and not something that would (or should) alarm a character.

I assume from the fact that you are asking the question, that by noticing the bird, and divining its purpose, the character can gain some advantage in the near future.

So to me, this isn't even a perception question, but an insight one - I would let the bird be seen, almost automatically, but only address its significance if the PC passes a passive (or active) insight check.

I would ask the player if they are keeping an eye out for trouble or anything else in particular. If they claim to be, ask for details of what they are looking for, and then give answers appropriate to the questions that are asked.

DM: You proceed down the path towards the building. The light of your lantern illuminates the way ahead, but darkness pervades on either side of you. Do you make right for the building, or do you want to play it safe a study your surroundings?

PC: Play it safe of course. What do I see?

DM: Well, there are some trees on your right. You hear the rustle of what might be wings of a small bird pass overhead. Are you looking for anything in particular?

PC: Well, am I sure the noise is just a bird and not something bigger? Do I see or hear anything threatening?

DM: You're not totally sure about the sound, but you don't see or hear anything threatening.

...

If your players are going to feel betrayed when the significance of the bird is sprung on them, have them hear a bird call as well as the bird above, and then if they ask about birds, let them see the one on the roof, and maybe another in a tree.

If your players don't go for the idea of player skill (embodied here by the need for the players to divine that birds are significant), then a similar scene can be played out, bringing passive insight (or perception) into play by giving out details if their passive score beats a medium or high difficulty for their level.

Picture a suspenseful scene in a film - as the viewer you would expect to be aware of the birds before they are meaningful, but you would either not expect to know the role they have to play, or not expect to know which bird it is you need to focus on unless you have already learned the significance of birds.


As for what to compare the PC's active or passive perception or insight against, the Rules Compendium p126 has the difficulty class by level chart.

I would suggest that this is medium or hard to detect (as significant) for a low level character - so I would pick hard for level 5, which is a target number of 22.

share|improve this answer
    
Awesome advice. Thanks. –  Lechlerfan May 2 '12 at 2:02
    
"If your players don't go for the idea of player skill..." This saddens me. –  Joe Jul 8 '12 at 21:39
add comment

Never ask your players for a skill roll you don't want them to fail.

(Credit to @Rantar in the comments.) While passive perception isn't a skill roll, it is still a check against a skill.

Is there a reason to not spot the bird? Failure is boring when it does not advance the plot. Mechanically speaking, if we look at the rules of hidden club, the only time a character is unaware of an element in their environment is when it makes (and can make) a stealth check that exceeds their passive perception.

Here's the thing. Failure tends to be boring.

If your logic goes something like:

enter image description here

Then you're doing it wrong. The trick is to enlist the player in setting mood and atmosphere. The essence of a skill check is a decision tree: if the players fail a check or a challenge, a disruption to the story is introduced. However, there is never simple failure.

Saying "no, you don't find the key that unlocks the magic door that guards the dragon's vaults so... you go home now?" is boring.

While rolling a dexterity check in lieu of a stealth check versus the passive perception is acceptable, the real question is does failure introduce anything useful to the story?

Why not ask "Does your character notice the ominous crow on the roof?"

Here, the player can characterize her character through success or failure, but regardless of narrative outcome (supporting character agency) the tone of the game is supported as players become aware of the foreshadowing.

share|improve this answer
6  
There is much win in this answer. –  Pat Ludwig May 2 '12 at 2:35
2  
On a related note, sometimes it's fun to point out a bird that's just a bird. (kenzerco.com/Operiodicals/kodt/kodt%20webstrips/…) –  Trey Kirk May 2 '12 at 15:03
5  
I have a general rule of thumb. Never ask your players for a skill roll you don't want them to fail. –  Rantar May 3 '12 at 17:54
    
I'd give you more than one upvote for this if I could! I've learned this multiple times through my 35 years of DM'ing –  SteveED May 4 '12 at 2:21
add comment

I guess you could use a passive perception check without a die roll and anyone who succeeds "feels uneasy" and then make that 'uneasy character(s) roll an active perception check to see why they feel uneasy etc? And then take it from there/ ie roll against the bird's stealth and other factors/mods etc?? This feeling 'uneasy' doesn't really give too much of a clue away, but creates enough suspense to make the character focus more to try and glean what is bothering them? ie/ "you feel you are being watched? " I guess if you don't always want a passive percentage to succeed or fail (it must always fall into one of these categories if there is no roll) you would have to make a sneaky die roll as a DM.

share|improve this answer
    
passive perception is never rolled (it's always 10+perception) –  wax eagle Oct 10 '12 at 16:50
add comment

Tell him that, because his character doesn't see much, he will need to roll for perception every now and then. Make the player roll a dice every time his character walks a given distance (depending on the total length of the walk, no need to roll every meter if he walks a kilometer).

You then decide that he could see whatever you want him to see between this point and that point. If he succeeds in throwing his dice at that point. He notices.

Example:

The walk is 50m, rolling dice every 5m. Chances to see a bird located at 25m.

Distance - Chance of seeing the bird
   0m                0%
   5m                0%
  10m                2%
  15m                8%
  20m               21%
  25m               42%
  30m               13%
  35m                1%
  40m                0%
  45m                0%
  50m                0%

If the dice is within the percentage chance of seeing it in a given spot, the PC notices it.

Example of dice results (d100):

0m: 27 (not noticing)
5m: 2 (not noticing, the player knows pretty much for sure there was nothing to notice here).
10m: 12 (not noticing)
15m: 51 (not noticing)
20m: 19 (noticing the bird 5 meters away!)

The player will keep on rolling until the end of the path, so he'll never know if there was anything else to notice…

share|improve this answer
    
why not just use passive perception and move on. That is what this question is asking about. –  wax eagle May 2 '12 at 12:22
4  
This seems to be an extremely laborious way of dealing with it. –  Phil May 3 '12 at 11:13
add comment

As has been noted by some, firstly one does NOT roll passive perception. The point of the mechanic is to eliminate the tipping off of players. You simply compare the bird's stealth result with the viewer's passive perception.

There are some other factors: the bird has a modifier to stealth based on size (tiny I think is +5, so value of 15) - so a passive perception of 17 would notice it. The lantern gives vision out so a certain radius, so the bird has to be within this radius.

However, a bird might be nothing out of the ordinary, so I would suggest an insight check (again as has been noted) - check vs. character's passive insight. This could be easy, moderate or hard depending on what clues the character might already have - or how unusual the spotting of the bird might be under the circumstances. If the insight check is not made, I wouldn't even tell the player about the bird, since it is nothing out of the ordinary.

share|improve this answer
1  
Welcome to RPG.SE. Are you sure about size modifiers in 4e? I'm not sure I've seen that anywhere. Regardless glad you are here! –  wax eagle May 2 '12 at 19:00
add comment

You're right - this is an easy one for an experienced GM but each may answer it differently depending on his/her style as evidenced by the previous answers.

As I see it, it is up to you to decide if he sees it or not. You have to use your own experience and judgement to determine the outcome.

Some things to consider:

  1. Is the character (PC) sneaking/being careful? If so, he will most like be more perceptive.
  2. Is it a moonless night/cloud cover/full moon. These all factor in to his possible perception.
  3. What is the characters perception? It is a good idea for the GM to know a few key things about each PC. One, in this case, is the character Perception. If it is high, he will most likely by his nature perceive the bird.
  4. Is seeing the bird important to your plot. If the bird is not spotted, will it further your story or derail it?
  5. Perhaps he does not see the bird, but hears it flapping its wings as it flies off. This is good atmosphere "You hear a bird flapping its wings as it flies away" - PC gets nervous....

It all comes to a decision you have to make to enhance your game. If you make the wrong decision and your group grumbles at this decision, then next time you know better.

As to your particular scenario, I would roll the dice behind the screen (or your hand) and go from there - Roll 15-20? He sees the bird. Roll 1-5? Snicker and roll your eyes and move on. Roll 5-15 maybe give a hint (flapping wings, scratching sounds of the birds talons on the slate roof, something that the PC perceives but cannot put his/her thumb on.

share|improve this answer
add comment

The nature of Passive Perception is that you don't roll it. If the bird would be spotted with a roll of 17, then you reveal the bird to the player. If not, not. It's the equivalent of the "take 10" mechanic from earlier editions of D&D, meant to minimize unneeded rolls.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.