Take the 2-minute tour ×
Role-playing Games Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for gamemasters and players of tabletop, paper-and-pencil role-playing games. It's 100% free, no registration required.

The rules packet does not provide any specific rules about flanking. However the rule does say that the DM has lots of leeway in deciding when to give advantage or disadvantage in combat. Should it be understood that flanking always gives advantage, or is the DM supposed to only give advantage when there is "clever flanking"? What is the best way to handle "flanking" in D&D 5e?

share|improve this question

5 Answers 5

up vote 4 down vote accepted

There is no flanking rule as a default, there are however a couple of optional rules proposed in the DM's handbook. It should also be noted that these are part of a general set of rules dedicated to playing using miniatures and tactical maps and even then they are marked as optional.

The flanking rule states:

Flanking on Squares. When a creature and at least one of its allies are adjacent to an enemy and on opposite sides or corners of the enemy's space, they flank that enemy, and each of them has advantage on melee attack rolls against that enemy.

When in doubt about whether two creatures flank an enemy on a grid, trace an imaginary line between the centers of the creatures' spaces. If the line passes through opposite sides or corners of the enemy's space, the enemy is flanked.

Flanking on Hexes. When a creature and at least one of its allies are adjacent to an enemy and on opposite sides of the enemy's space, they flank that enemy, and each of them has advantage on attack rolls against that enemy. On hexes, count around the enemy from one creature to its ally. Against a Medium or smaller creature, the allies flank if there are 2 hexes between them. Against a Large creature, the allies flank if there are 4 hexes between them. Against a Huge creature, they must have 5 hexes between them. Against a Gargantuan creature, they must have at least 6 hexes between them.

DM's Handbook p.251

Another alternative but optional rule offered by the DM's guide is called facing.

If you want the precision of knowing which way a creature is facing, consider using this optional rule.

Whenever a creature ends its move, it can change its facing. Each creature has a front arc (the direction it faces), left and right side arcs, and a rear arc. A creature can also change its facing as a reaction when any other creature moves.

DM's Handbook p.252

This rules suggest the following effects:

  • An attacker in a creature's rear arc has advantage
  • Shield bonuses only apply AC to the front arc and side arc of the shield arm.
  • Some creatures will not have limited arcs, like an amorphous blob

This is arguably more complex to adjudicate and manage than flanking is.

A potential issue one could take with flanking in 5e is related to the change in AoO rules. Previously, circling a creature tightly, even with a 5ft reach would provoke an AoO, as you were moving through threatened squares. In order to flank and avoid an AoO you would typically need to go wide or use an ability. In 5e an AoO is only provoked when you move out of a creatures reach without disengaging. In my opinion this makes it effectively trivial to flank.

As a further counter argument, keep in mind that DND 5e adds the "help" action, which can easily be used as an analogous--yet more general and less powerful--mechanic.

Alternatively, you can aid a friendly creature in attacking a creature within 5 feet of you. You feint, distract the target, or in some other way team up to make your ally’s attack more effective. If your ally attacks the target before your next turn, the first attack roll is made with advantage.

Player's Handbook p.192

In order to create an advantage one attacker must focus on helping through a distraction or combat engagement at the disadvantage of not being able to effectively score a hit. However, this still gives the other attacker a far better chance at scoring a hit. This makes this more useful against powerful opponents while being unimportant against lesser ones. I feel this makes this a much more tactical choice than mere positioning, while still providing a simple and generic mechanic that feels balanced and is unlikely to be overused.

share|improve this answer
    
Another drawback is that it undermines the "specialness" of the rogue's sneak attack trigger, albeit in a minor way. When adding optional rules, it's often worth considering whether it overlaps with, and therefore reduces the value of, a class/racial/feat perk that already exists. –  detly 12 hours ago

Being a playtester DM I've spent some time to make a list of all the things that grant advantage and disadvantage within the current ruleset.

The following things grant advantage to an attack roll:

  • Hidden attacker
  • Attacker being helped†
  • Paralyzed target
  • Prone target (melee attacks only)
  • Restrained target
  • Stunned target
  • Unconscious target
  • Frightned (signaled by Chrin Nicola and probably a later addition)

Unless you apply DM fiat, flanking does not give advantage.

† Flanking doesn't count as "helping" in D&D Next. Helping is a specific action. It used to exist in previous editions (3.x) and it gave +2 to the attack roll, provided the aiding character was adjacent to both the aided one and its target. The distinction here is that helping is an action and therefore it uses up your turn. Flanking in 3.x is a passive thing that requires no action itself, just good positioning, so both flanking characters get to attack (if they have any action left, that is) and both get the flanking bonus.

share|improve this answer
    
You can also aid a friendly creature in attacking a creature within 5 feet of you. In this scenario, you give away your attack and your friend gains advantage on his attack roll. (PHB. 192 - Help Action) –  felipecrp Jan 10 at 3:27
    
Should probably add Frightened to this list. Results in a disadvantage on all roles while the source of fear is visible. –  Chris Nicola 16 hours ago

In the current 5E playtest, there is no flanking. In fact, there are few rules for combat at all, and definitely no rules for grid-based combat and positioning. As stated elsewhere, the playtest doesn't represent the final ruleset, so positioning rules may be added later on, but for now, granting advantage is merely a judgement call.

Personally, I would say that it depends a lot on the situation. A normal humanoid creature being ganged up on by two assailants might be at a disadvantage, whereas as large creature, or exceptionally skilled opponent, might not have that same problem. Grant advantage on a case by case basis, and come up with a set of criteria that suit you and your gaming group.

share|improve this answer
    
There actually are rules for grid based combat and positioning. For example, a medium sized creature can only be surrounded by 8 other medium sized creature, and a gargantuan creature takes up "3 slots" etc. I believe it's in the DM section rather than the general rules though. Other than that small point, I think you have a good answer. –  GMNoob May 28 '12 at 10:35
    
Right, I had missed those. Still, the point stands. The "surrounding" rules are just a way to account for that sort of thing when not using a grid. That being said: I would definitely grant (dis)advantage if someone was mostly surrounded. –  Mike Riverso May 28 '12 at 15:13
2  
@GMNoob Surrounding rules date back to 2e and 1e and are unrelated to the WotC-era concept of "flanking". I would not grant disadvantage to someone surrounded unless an enemy's pack tactics needed to be represented via advantage. Being attacked 8 times a round is plenty deadly all itself. –  SevenSidedDie May 29 '12 at 19:37

There's an optional rule for Flanking in the 5th edition Dungeon Master's Guide.

The gist of it is that indeed, flanking does give advantage to each of the flankers.

For details, see the p.251 in the book.

share|improve this answer
    
Good new information but not a complete answer - the best answer to this question would also cover the base case and not just an optional rule. –  mxyzplk Dec 29 '14 at 17:22

I don't believe the intent is that flanking always grants advantage, but of course all the rules aren't out yet. It seems like it's hearkening back to 1e-2e where backstab required actual stealth or other sneakniess and the rogue wasn't a DPS machine. There's nothing to indicate you can get advantage simply by flanking (it would be way too powerful for random positioning to get you 2d20 take highest IMO). It says nothing anywhere about flanking conveying Advantage so assuming it does is quite unsupported by the rules.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.