Role-playing Games Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for gamemasters and players of tabletop, paper-and-pencil role-playing games. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I have a number of players using overly-complex character creation. While it is possible to take the 240 xp from detailed and map it to overly-complex during apprenticeship, there are a number of hard-to-swallow abstractions.

One of the most problematic is the abstraction of teaching spells. A huge number of spells can be taught in a season, as a function of the lab total of the teacher. What is a fair way to estimate the experience of a parens such that an overly-complex character doesn't have an undue advantage and doesn't involve simply building the parens from scratch?

share|improve this question

If a character already has their final scores in magical arts, you could add 2d6+10 (or some other pseudo-random value) to get the parens score in that art. So, if I have a muto of 20, my parens would have 37 on average. Of course, just because a parens can know a spell does not mean that they do.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.