Take the 2-minute tour ×
Role-playing Games Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for gamemasters and players of tabletop, paper-and-pencil role-playing games. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Exactly how does Adventurer Conqueror King differ from B/X D&D, Labyrinth Lord, and Pathfinder? If I wanted to begin playing with a system-light D&D, preferred ascending AC, and wanted something "out of the box" without a lot of rules-fixing, what would you recommend and why?

share|improve this question

As this is a game-recommendation question, please adhere to the FAQ, the rules for subjective questions as outlined in Good Subjective, Bad Subjective and our rules for game recommendations. All responses must cite actual experience or reference others' experiences!

add comment

2 Answers 2

ACKS is closely derived from B/X by way of Labyrinth Lord. Ascending AC is one of its differences as explained here. The esteemed Mr. Conley does a good job of describing the other things ACKS is designed to do "out of the box", although I think the rules for running a thieves' guild and sending out your underlings to do hijinks are also worthy of mention.

You could separate race from class in Adventurer Conqueror King most easily by allowing any race to become any class. You might then want to define racial bonuses separately - right now they're baked into ACKS' non-human racial classes. (You could also leave racial effects as part of the setting instead of the rules; as it stands, humans don't get bonuses but are much more likely to enjoy positions of power in society.)

It'd be straightforward to adapt racial bonuses from any other D&D-lineage system. If you wanted to get more into it, the ACKS Player's Companion has a class design system that lets you create custom classes balanced for factors like racial bonuses, with a couple of examples of new race/class combos. The assumption is still race-as-class, but you could just as well use the system to design class features and racial bonuses separate of one another.

share|improve this answer
    
bought the .pdf :D ___when is the Player's Companion due out? –  Wodan Sep 20 '12 at 12:22
    
Real soon now! If you pre-order it through Game Salute you can get a download link for a PDF that isn't indexed and formatted for screens rather than book-binding; I hope it won't take much more than a week or two to make this into a final PDF version. Hardcover will be about two months after that, but if you email me at tavis@autarch.co I'll slip you the Word file so you can get started right away. –  Tavis Allison Sep 21 '12 at 0:57
add comment

It's design is basically an expansion of B/X D&D.

It still has race as class but expands the number of racial classes into a section labeled Demi-Human Classes for example there is a Dwarven Vaultguard and a Dwarven CraftPriest.

It adds proficiencies which are skill and abilities mostly non-combat oriented. They represent something that the character is better at than a non-proficient person.

The heart of ACKS is the campaign section where the author add several subsystems that allow the character to impact the setting beyond the usual adventuring locales. These include

  • Magic Research
  • Ritual Spells
  • Constructs
  • Crossbreeds
  • Necromancy
  • Divine Power
  • Strongholds and Domains
  • Sanctums and Dungeons*
  • Mercantile Ventures

The treasure type system has been tweaked to work with the various assumptions on wealth and income outlined in the above subsystems.

share|improve this answer
    
Thank you very much for your answer. If i decided to separate race from class (using B/X Compendium or LL AEC), how difficult would you gauge it? –  Wodan Sep 19 '12 at 22:03
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.