If I make an opportunity attack with a ranged weapon (e.g., a crossbow) against an adjacent enemy, does it provoke an opportunity attack as well?
|
As a general rule, "An opportunity attack is a melee basic attack" (Compendium glossary), so this doesn't come up much. However, there are special cases: Ninth Legion Student [Lesser Style] lets you use Direct the Strike (ranged 5) "in place of a melee basic attack when making an opportunity attack." Now, both the Glossary entry for Ranged Attack and the entry for Opportunity Attack explicitly say that ranged powers provoke OAs from adjacent enemies. To me, this means that ranged OAs provoke OAs unless a feat/power/item/feature explicitly lists an exception. Conclusion: YES. Ranged attacks always provoke opportunity attacks, even when the ranged attack is itself an opportunity attack. It's really uncommon though, as using ranged attacks for OAs is a rare exception to the "only-MBAs-for-OAs" rule, and there'd have to be a second enemy adjacent to you to take advantage of the granted OA anyway. [Note: OAs interrupt the action that provoked them, so causality might get messy to track if this procs a chain of OAs.] |
|||||||||||
|
|
YES, though the term "provokes" applies poorly to D&D 4th edition. Rather than "provoking opportunity attacks", you should think in terms of Opportunity Actions being triggered by certain conditions. An enemy making a ranged attack adjacent to you is one of the triggers for the basic at-will power Thus, Thus, there are four relevant scenarios worth considering with ranged opportunity attacks. In each example, "X" can use a Ranged Basic Attack as an Opportunity Attack, and in each X is an enemy to Z and O. First: X and O are adjacent to one another, and it is O's turn.
O moves away from X.
O's movement meets the trigger condition for X's HOWEVER he cannot use that power because it is his turn. In this example, O's ranged attack triggers X's End result: Second: both Z and O are adjacent to X, and it is O's turn.
Once again, O moves away from X.
Once again, O's movement triggers X's HOWEVER this also triggers an End result: Third: both Z and O are adjacent to X, and it is Z's turn.
This time, Z uses a close burst power that allows O to move as a free action.
Once again, O's movement triggers X's This time O can take an End result: Fourth: both Z and O are adjacent to X, and it is Z's turn.
This time, Z uses a ranged power that allows O to move as a free action.
This time, X's In either case, however, the scenario plays out the same as the third example. End result: I hope that wasn't too long and convoluted, but hopefully it helps clarify the order of |
|||
|
|
