Take the 2-minute tour ×
Role-playing Games Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for gamemasters and players of tabletop, paper-and-pencil role-playing games. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I understand that there are differences between the way Armor Class works in AD&D (first edition) and Basic D&D (the boxed sets, Rules Cyclopedia, etc.), but I don't have the books to check it out. My understanding is that one starts at AC 9 and the other starts at AC 10, but I don't know which is which. I'm going to be running a campaign using Labyrinth Lord and the Advanced Edition Companion with old modules from both versions of D&D. Will I need to adjust AC? Are there any other armor differences I should know about?

share|improve this question

3 Answers 3

up vote 6 down vote accepted

Basic D&D has different Dex modifiers to AC, and different entries for armors worse than chain. The combination can result in up to a 2 point AC difference.

Note that AD&D2E has the same AC's as 1E, but has more armors; I've put the ones not in 1E PH in (parentheses).

_____________________ Armor for a given AC _______________________
AC  Basic           Advanced D&D 1E (2E)             Labyrinth Lord
10  --- . . . . . . None . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ---
 9  No Armor  . . . Shield Only  . . . . . . . . . . Unarmored 
 8  Shield Only . . Leather/Padded . . . . . . . . . Padded, Leather
 7  Leather . . . . Studded Leather, Ring Mail . . . Studded Leather
 6  Scale Mail  . . Scale, (Brigandine, Hide)  . . . Scale Mail
 5  Chain Mail  . . Chain Mail . . . . . . . . . . . Chain Mail
 4  Banded Mail . . Banded, Splint, (Bronze Plate) . Banded,Splint
 3  Plate Mail  . . Plate Mail . . . . . . . . . . . Plate Mail
 2  --- . . . . . . (Field Plate)  . . . . . . . . . ---
 1  --- . . . . . . (Full Plate) . . . . . . . . . . ---
 0  Suit Armor  . . ---  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ---

AC Dex Adjustment
Dex:             3  4  5  6  7-8 9-12 13-14 15  16  17 18-19 20-21 22-23
Basic D&D:      +3 +2 +2 +1  +1   +0   -1   -1  -2  -2   -3   -4    -5 
Advanced D&D 1: +4 +3 +2 +1  +0   +0   +0   -1  -2  -3   -4   --    --
Advanced D&D 2: +4 +3 +2 +1  +0   +0   +0   -1  -2  -3   -4   -5    -6
Labyrinth Ld:   +3 +2 +2 +1  +1   +0   -1   -1  -2  -2   -3   --    --

For monsters, you won't need to adjust at all. For characters, if AC is 6 or higher, you may want to adjust it.

References:
TSR2010 AD&D1E Player's Handbook, 6th printing, ©1980.
TSR2101 AD&D2E Player's Handbook Electronic Edition (from Core Rules 2.0 CD)
TSR1071 D&D Rules Cyclopedia Scanned/OCR'd Edition (From DTRPG)
GBD1001 Labyrinth Lord (No Art, via DTRPG.)

Edit Note: I added the LL data in for completeness.

share|improve this answer
    
It is also worth noting that the 1e AD&D Monster Manual, which was the first AD&D book published, still used the original/basic ACs. –  Robert Fisher Jun 4 '13 at 13:56
    
Actually, @RobertFisher , 1E doesn't. –  aramis 22 hours ago
    
See odd74.proboards.com/thread/2515 for some discussion about this. The 1e MM also only used the 5-way alignment system instead of the eventual 9-way system of the PHB. –  Robert Fisher 15 hours ago

That's basically it. Technically the Dexterity adjustments to armour class table is slightly different between 1e and Basic as well, but that's fairly minor - I probably wouldn't worry about that as DM, unless I was helping convert PCs between the two systems.

Note 1st edition also had a more complex system of attack modifiers depending on weapon-vs-armour type that further modified the to-hit rolls for extra realism, but I don't think you'd experience any major problems from not using it.

share|improve this answer

That is correct, Basic D&D starts off at 9 and AD&D starts off at 10. But the differences are slight. For example no armor is 9 in BD&D and 10 in AD&D, leather is 7 in BD&D vs 8 in AD&D, but chain is 5 in both, and plate is 3 in both.

The difference is inconsequential and represent at most a -1 to hit at the lower armor classes. If you really concerned about it then subtract 1 from AC when it lower than 5 if using an AD&D module. But likely you will be looking up the monster stat in the Labyrinth Lord rulebook anyway. So it is a wash.

share|improve this answer
    
I concur...you're looking at a 5% difference(at most..depending on armor type) in "To-Hit" values. Also some old school modules list creatures as Orcs(3): HPs (3, 3, 5) and don't even list AC, which helps put players/creatures on the same AC page, assuming the same reference material for characters/creatures. –  Rich Sample Aug 20 '10 at 15:06
2  
otoh some players are rather insistent about that 5%. –  ExTSR Aug 21 '10 at 1:52
    
And, due to the different tables for both armor and dex mods, it's up to 2 points different. –  aramis Dec 13 '10 at 6:50

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.