Take the 2-minute tour ×
Role-playing Games Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for gamemasters and players of tabletop, paper-and-pencil role-playing games. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Though I am not advocating a strict adherence to the wealth by level progression, if that progression is used, how would "extra crew members" of PCs fit on the chart? The leadership feat text does indicate that the "cohort does not count as a party member when determining the party's XP". Does this also apply to wealth? Does a higher level PC with a cohort and followers via the leadership feat factor the equipment of the cohort and all of the followers into the wealth of the PC? Or does each individual entity track wealth separately? How does a DM figure out, if the cohort / follower(s) is brought on an adventure, what amount of treasure to reward the party with? And to a lesser extent, how does this apply to familiars and animal companions who may support certain item slots?

share|improve this question
add comment

2 Answers

up vote 2 down vote accepted

XP: “The Cohort does not count as a party member when determining the PARTY's XP”

To determine XP: “Divide the cohort’s level by the level of the PC with whom (s)he is associated with. Multiply this result by the total XP awarded to the PC & add that number of xp to the cohort’s total.

IF a cohort gains enough XP to bring it to a level one lower than the associated PC’s Character level, the cohort does NOT gain the new level-it’s new XP total is 1 less than the amount needed to level up. (Cohorts must be at least 2 levels lower than the PC)

Wealth: (Edited with reference) “The cohort should be equipped with gear appropriate for its’ level.” This is for "starting wealth" Once they adventure with the party they are entitled to some treasure.

DMG pg 105:
"Although the PCs can work out other deals, their cohorts usually get only a half share of any treasure the party gains."

"sometimes a cohort seeks no pay, only the opportunity to serve alongside the PCs. Such cohorts require only living costs. However, they are not common."

share|improve this answer
    
Find anything else regarding cohorts expecting wealth from the PC / party? –  Matt Hamsmith Feb 8 '13 at 21:01
    
I have updated the wealth portion on how to deal with treasure –  Ben-Jamin Feb 9 '13 at 0:10
    
@Ben-Jamin aha! Upvoted, and updated my own answer to direct people to yours for more correct info. –  KRyan Feb 9 '13 at 1:42
add comment

Cohort gets half a share of treasure

See @Ben-Jamin’s answer.

Personally, I feel that Leadership is already an incredibly powerful feat. Making the Leader pay for that opportunity to double their action economy seems entirely justifiable to me. Making the feat double your action economy and add extra wealth seems even worse than it is otherwise.

Familiars, Animal Companions, Psicrystals, et al. do not get wealth

These are still NPCs, but were they not attached to another character they most likely would not have treasure, and in a few of these cases they literally cannot exist as separate characters. Any gear they wind up wearing should be paid for by the master, just as a knight would pay for his horse’s barding.

share|improve this answer
    
I really should find a citation for the Cohort bit, but I've seen this discussed without finding a resolution before so for now I'm assuming there is none. I personally ban Leadership in every game I run, and play with DMs who do the same or else heavily tweak it to make it more reasonable. –  KRyan Feb 6 '13 at 19:21
2  
Making matters worse, suppose a character doesn't take the Leadership feat until 18th level. Suddenly, a potentially 16th level cohort joins the party "equipped with gear appropriate for its level" (feat description). What constitutes "appropriate" is the crux of this question, but any way you cut it, that is a significant amount of wealth that just waltzed into the party without a new PC joining the game. –  Matt Hamsmith Feb 6 '13 at 19:37
1  
Ummmmm...... my crossbow trigger finger is a bit slower than you expect? :) Your answer is thus upvoted. –  Matt Hamsmith Feb 6 '13 at 20:12
    
I dont have my books on me atm, but I thiought there was a RAW definition that said the cohort expected a fair share of the loot..meaning basically it comes out of the party's share? Is that incorrect? –  Ben-Jamin Feb 6 '13 at 20:54
5  
Fun fact: your cohort can have leadership, too. –  Scrollmaster Feb 6 '13 at 21:43
show 4 more comments

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.