Role-playing Games Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for gamemasters and players of tabletop, paper-and-pencil role-playing games. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

We just finished playing our first game of Microscope and had a great time. Most of the elements of the game were handled very well by the group: periods, events, the palette, etc.

Scenes, however, no one had much use for. As the one presenting the game, I tried starting scenes, but the players didn't find them helpful or interesting. I feel like the game misses out on something without scenes, but I'm not sure how to proceed.

What makes a Scene worthwhile in the game, leading the players to want to know what happens next?

share|improve this question
up vote 12 down vote accepted

Don't bother with Scenes if you don't want to make Scenes. There is no "right" mix of history elements – the ones you make are the right ones for your group. The game is responsive that way, tuned to your interests. You had fun and built a neat history, so you did nothing wrong at all.

If you want to have more Scenes though, focus less on simply having Scenes, and more on asking interesting questions that you actually want answered. Eventually, you'll hit upon a question that you really want to see explored in a Scene, and there you go, that's your Scene. What makes a Scene worthwhile is everyone being invested in exploring and answering the Scene's question.

Scenes are not for the sake of having Scenes – they are for answering open questions about the history. If you don't have a compelling question, you don't need a Scene.

share|improve this answer
+1: ask compelling questions – Joe May 21 '13 at 19:25

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.