Take the 2-minute tour ×
Role-playing Games Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for gamemasters and players of tabletop, paper-and-pencil role-playing games. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Does he become useless?

Do you have to place a houserule?

Is it spending actions on getting invisible or out of sight again the only way to get sneak attack again?

It seems to me a ranged rogue has a difficult game ahead, and I would like to see it balanced, Im sure there's something to make it so. Or something I'm missing.

share|improve this question
    
Both of these systems do have feats - albeit third party feats - that open up the option of ranged flanking. Dragon #350 (pp90 iirc) gives you a 15' threat range, while the Pathfinder version nets you 30'. This could potentially allow you to flank more than one opponent at a time. –  Phill.Zitt May 23 '13 at 18:03

4 Answers 4

As @mxyzplk said, you will need to deny your opponents their Dexterity bonus to AC.

Here are some ways to do that at range (sorry about the length):

Force them to Balance

Opponents are flat-footed while Balancing unless they have 5 ranks in Balance in 3.5 (or just always, regardless of their Acrobatics skill in PF, if I recall). The Grease spell works well if you have a mage handy, marbles (from the Arms and Equipment Guide) are a cheap mundane alternative. This is a low-level tactic that fades in usefulness as more enemies start flying.

Obtain Invisibility

The standard Invisibility spell and the associated ring only work for one attack, Greater Invisibility is better. The easiest ways to get Greater Invisibility are usually asking a friendly mage, obtaining a wand (use your Use Magic Device skill!) or prestige/multiclassing into a class that offers it, like Assassin.

Hide

The Hide rules are odd, but they can get the job done. Forget that Sniping option, it's redundant due to this line:

It’s practically impossible (-20 penalty) to hide while attacking, running or charging.

So just do the impossible. Pump up your Hide skill and hide while attacking. You will most likely need to find some way to get a Hide in Plain Sight ability (depending on the version you use, you may also need a way to generate cover or concealment), in core, the Shadowdancer is probably the best. Outside of core, you have things like the Dark template (Tome of Magic) to do it more easily.

In any case, this is a powerful option if you are good at increasing your skill check modifiers. Particularly, this can work even against foes with True Seeing (which foils Invisibility). If you take the Darkstalker feat (Lords of Madness), it foils several common anti-hide special abilities too.

Blink

The Blink spell denies your opponents their Dexterity bonus to AC. This is useful because there is a handy ring that grants the spell, even if it comes with limitations.

Blinking works best when combined with the Pierce Magical Concealment feat from Complete Arcane, to negate your own miss chance.

Other: Specific Sneak Attack enforcing options

There are ways to deliver Sneak Attack damage outside normal limitations (the target needing to be flanked or denied Dexterity bonus). The most effective ones I know are:

  • The Hunter's Mercy (Spell Compendium) or Surge of Fortune (Complete Champion) spells combined with the Telling Blow feat (Player's Handbook 2)
  • The Wracking Touch spell (Spell Compendium)

These may be difficult to fit into a build, but they can be effective.

There are also things like the Arcane Trickster's Impromptu Sneak Attack, but that's a limited ability of an unimpressive class.

Other: Flank anywhere

The Clarion Commander tactical feat (Tome of Battle) has this option:

you make a DC 20 Intimidate check against an opponent as a standard action. If this check succeeds and you make a successful melee attack against the same foe on your next turn, you and your allies can treat that enemy as flanked for 1 minute.

This unusual wording allows anyone to flank without the usual setup. Assuming no argument is made about it simply not being possible to take advantage of this "flanking" with a ranged weapon, it allows a Rogue to Sneak Attack from range without denying Dex.

So, if there's someone in your party who is likely to get in a melee attack in the first round of each combat (even if that is the Rogue) and that someone can be convinced to take this feat, the Rogue is set.

Do not recommend: Grapple

While it may be tempting to pair up with a big bruiser and have them grapple opponents while you pepper with ranged attacks, the strategy becomes awkward in practice. At low levels, you will not have the Improved Precise Shot feat, so shooting into a grapple will be a dangerous game. At higher levels, monsters with enormous grapple check modifiers and/or Freedom of Movement effects become rather too common for grappling to be a reliable strategy at all.

share|improve this answer
    
Tome of Battle has several strikes that turn a foe flat-footed, which may be worth mentioning. The action costs on Clarion Commander are... rough. I’d rather it be easier to use but not last so long. –  KRyan Dec 9 '13 at 16:54
    
Hmmm, good call. Most (all?) of them are melee-only, but I never really considered that they don't render the opponent flat-footed only with respect to the initiator. I'll try to remember to look some up... –  Ernir Dec 9 '13 at 17:01
2  
There is another tactic worth considering: fear. Frightened and panicked opponents must flee as quickly as possible, which usually means running, and unless they have the Run feat they lose their Dex bonus and can be sneak attack shot in the back as they run away. If you can get them to cower, even better. Most fear effects stack so there are a ton of different ways today pull this off. –  Epiphanis Dec 9 '13 at 18:27

A ranged rogue usually can not get sneak attacks after the opponents have acted (surprise round if any plus first round while still flat footed). The rules are set up so that you can't just SA all the time with ranged. You get sneak attack when opponents are a) denied DEX bonus to their AC, typically from being flat-footed or b) flanked by the rogue, and you can't flank with a ranged weapon because it doesn't threaten targets.

You can try:

  1. Sniping - you can try to Stealth after a shot, which has a -20 penalty but then you're hidden again and can attack opponents flat-footed.

  2. Other ways of making opponents flat-footed, where Greater Invisibility and Grease are the most popular but having your comrades inflict the flat-footed condition somehow also works.

There are probably "uber combos" out there that can let a rogue get ranged SAs in other circumstances but in general, no, SA'ing with ranged is limited to the first part of the combat by design.

The rogue is not "useless" at that point, he can be as good as anyone with a ranged weapon, just perhaps not getting his SA on every single attack. You can read Rogue Eidolon's Rogue Class Guide for an archery rogue build that is quite competitive.

share|improve this answer

I always thought what worked best is the ninja trick vanish, it lets you at least get some more in until you can afford the ring or have enough levels of char to be a shadow dancer and get HipS

share|improve this answer
    
Hi, welcome to the site! Nice answer, +1, but it would be nice if you linked to the PF SRD page on the trick so we could all see it easily. Also, you should take the time to check out the Tour, and when you get 20 rep, feel free to join us in the Chat! –  KRyan Dec 7 '13 at 18:27

Like anybody else, barring special feats/abilities, a rogue archer may gain the benefits of Hiding against an observer as a skill check during any movement in/through a square that has partial or total concealment or cover and the observer isn't already observing you, "even casually" (PHB 3.5 p 76). That usually means you have to make your Hide check before you enter line-of-sight with the potential observer (i.e., you already have total concealment).

Once you enter the observer's line-of-sight (from your movement, his, or changes in the environment) the result of your Hide check becomes the DC that observer has to beat with an opposing Spot check in order to see you. If he succeeds, you retain any partial concealment/cover you have from your environment but you are observed and the observer does not become flat-footed relative to you. If he fails, you are not observed and you are effectively invisible to him during that action.

Although the rules don't spell it out clearly enough for anyone's taste, it is generally agreed that taking any action to draw attention, including making an attack, immediately ends the effect of a Hide attempt. There is some disagreement on the exact implications of this. Many people interpret the rule as that all effects of hiding immediately end. Others believe that the benefits of hiding persist during the single action that ended it, so the attack would be as if from invisibility, with a +2 to the attack roll and no Dex bonus to the defender.

My interpretation is different from both of these, and I have no idea if the game designers would support me, but I still consider it an interpretation rather than a house rule. As far as I'm concerned, any effect that renders an individual flat-footed relative to you (as an unsuccessfully contested Hide check does) persists until the flat-footed individual's next turn, just as the condition ends during the character's first turn during any combat encounter. Thus, an attack from hiding wouldn't get the +2 of an invisible attack, but the flat-footedness of the target persists until that target's next turn. (Same goes for a terminating [non-Improved] Invisibility spell.)

Whichever interpretation is "correct," here are some things to consider in playing a sniper rogue:

The -20 Hide check costing a move action to reestablish hiding after a shot is difficult but very possible at higher levels, with Hide- and Dex improving enhancements and against opponents with bad Spot checks.

Snipers favor positions at 90-degree angle corners. Firing around the corner gives you the necessary cover to maintain the Hide. Every other turn you can take a move action to retreat behind the corner, break line of sight with total concealment, and return to the firing position with your Hide re-established (repeat this trick too often, though, and savvy opponents will counter it by advancing or readying actions against your reappearance).

As with any stealther, remain aware of the limitations of your source of concealment. If you yourself are affected by it, it negates any precision damage including your own sneak attack! Ordinary darkness is almost useless in dungeons since nearly everything will have Darkvision. Magical darkness is better but very far from foolproof, especially once True Seeing comes into play. Smoke/mist effects are generally the hardest to overcome, both for your target and yourself. If you can gain the benefit of a blindsight effect, smokesticks become your favorite gear -- and any fool who thinks True Seeing makes him immune to stealthers is in for a rude awakening.

A sniper's favorite feat should be Shot On the Run. With it, you can move in and out of zones of concealment fluidly. If you can sneak out of and back into total concealment and still attack within a single turn, that's a huge advantage that obviates the -20 post-Sniping Hide attempt.

share|improve this answer
    
If the target has no Line of Sight to you, there is no reason to even bother rolling Hide; they cannot see you. You would roll as you re-enter their Line of Sight. And unless you re-enter into Cover/Concealment (or have Camouflage or certain versions of Hide in Plain Sight), you still can’t roll Hide, and if you leave that Cover/Concealment (without Camo/HiPS), you cannot continue to Hide. Finally, your “interpretation not houserule” is explicitly contradicted by the rules (Rules Compendium), so yes, it is a houserule (a good one, I might add, but that’s neither here nor there). –  KRyan Dec 9 '13 at 7:05
    
Also, true seeing doesn’t let you see through magical darkness (the darkness is real, typically an Evocation, not faked as with an Illusion or Transmutation). And by utilizing Shot on the Run, you are automatically giving up your extra attacks (incompatible with full attacks, Rapid Shot, Manyshot, etc.), making it very difficult to make your precision damage worthwhile (since Sneak Attack et al. rely on racking up many triggering hits). –  KRyan Dec 9 '13 at 7:08
    
(sorry if this comes off as a bit harsh; this is still a good answer in that it offers clear, consistent advice backed up by your experience. I just feel it is important to get the facts right; some of the details you list are not standard and that should be noted.) –  KRyan Dec 9 '13 at 7:10
1  
@KRyan : I agree with everything in your first comment, except the part about my interpretation/house rule being directly contradicted by the Rules Compendium, which may be true but I can't identify specifically what excerpt you mean. The True Seeing writeup on PH 3.5 p. 296 says "The subject sees through normal and magical darkness..." –  Epiphanis Dec 9 '13 at 8:28
    
I also agree with all your statements re the tradeoffs of using Shot on the Run, but think they are totally worth it for a rogue. If you can make a single sneak attack each round, that's actually pretty awesome damage output; if you can do so while getting total concealment between your turns, that's some fine gravy! –  Epiphanis Dec 9 '13 at 8:38

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.