Role-playing Games Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for gamemasters and players of tabletop, paper-and-pencil role-playing games. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

This answer shows that in DFRPG "if you're invoking an aspect on another PC or on a NPC to gain an advantage over them, that character will receive the fate point you spent, either at the end of the exchange (in conflict, see page 197) or at the end of the scene (outside of conflict)." (YS106)

But in Fate Core, "if someone pays a fate point to invoke an aspect attached to your character, you gain their fate point at the end of the scene." (Core81)

Why did Evil Hat change invocation so that Fate points are given out only at the end of a scene?

share|improve this question
up vote 24 down vote accepted

Because it discourages zero-sum exchanges.

Someone just asked this of Fred Hicks in the Fate Core Kickstarter comments. He replied that if Fate points are exchanged immediately after the action in which they were used, the flow of Fate points would become zero-sum.

I have an aspect you're invoking, to my detriment, so I'm gonna be getting that fate point.
You spend it and I get it right away.
I take what I got from you right away and spend it to invoke one of your aspects.

This cheapens the use of Fate points because you can get them back so quickly and easily, and removes some of the narrative flow. A failure due to being invoked against shouldn't set you up for success in the next exchange, but in the next scene.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.