Sign up ×
Role-playing Games Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for gamemasters and players of tabletop, paper-and-pencil role-playing games. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I'm playing a Dragon Fire Adept Kobold, and the Slight Build feature made it seem like I could share a space with a party member.

Slight Build: The physical stature of kobolds lets them function in many ways as if they were one size category smaller. Whenever a kobold is subject to a size modifier or special size modifier for an opposed check (such as Hide), the kobold is treated as one size smaller if doing so is advantageous to the character. A kobold is also considered to be one size smaller when "squeezing" through a restrictive space. A kobold can use weapons designed for a creature one size smaller without penalty. However, the space and reach of a kobold remain those of a creature of their actual size. The benefits of this racial trait stack with the effects of powers, abilities, and spells that change the subject's size category.

So I could share a square with my fighter and use my breath weapon against the enemy without hitting my fighter?

share|improve this question
Hi Kaz, welcome to! Good first question. Please take a look at our About when you get a chance. I edited your question, please make sure I preserved the intent. – C. Ross Nov 2 '13 at 19:22

2 Answers 2

No, you can't.

The slight build quality explicitly tells you "the space [...] of a kobold remain(s) that of a creature of their actual size", meaning they cannot be considered tiny for, between other things, sharing squares with teammates.

share|improve this answer

By strict RAW, no, you cannot. The Slight Build rules you quoted itemize the exact circumstances for which you count as Tiny, and determining square-sharing is not covered by any of the listed items. However, it seems probable that the RAI was for you to function as Tiny pretty much whenever doing so is to your benefit, and even if this is not the true RAI, it is still a very reasonable thing to allow. I would allow it in my own games, and would recommend that other GMs do likewise, but with the clear understanding that it is a house rule to do so, and not supported by RAW.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.