Role-playing Games Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for gamemasters and players of tabletop, paper-and-pencil role-playing games. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Can people actually see spells in the meat space world? Which might end up breaking it down to the individual spell as I would believe that physical combat spells such as fireball would obviously be seen. Where as the manipulation spell influence would not leave any sort of trace [save for astrally]. But what about mana combat spells like mana bolt?

And how would a spell like Improved invisibility effect the visibility of the spell?

Thanks Chummers!

share|improve this question
up vote 8 down vote accepted

"Can people actually see spells in the meat space world?"

"Noticing magic is a Simple Perception + Intuition [Mental] Test with a threshold equal to..." + "Obviously, if a magician is throwing fire from his fingertips, you’re probably going to notice without making a test. But if the magic is subtle, then you have to pick up some dice."

  • p.280-281 "Perceiving Magic", SR5

The same section brings up manabolt as an example. :)

"This spell makes the subject more difficult to detect by normal visual senses" + "Invisibility affects the minds of viewers. Improved Invisibility mimics the subject’s surroundings from all angles and affects technological sensors as well."

  • p.291, "Improved Invisibility", SR5

I think an attack spell is not part of the "subject" here. Also, I don't think spells have only a visual component.

share|improve this answer
Ok I think we took this and made some modifiers to house rule it up a bit. I had forgotten about the magic perception. – John Nov 13 '13 at 12:09

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.