Take the 2-minute tour ×
Role-playing Games Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for gamemasters and players of tabletop, paper-and-pencil role-playing games. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Some Setting Sun maneuvers are concentrated on throwing your target - Devastating Throw, Comet Throw etc, and some of them get even more throwing range than 10 ft. AND add some decent damage to that. But I've been thinking - can one increase the damage by throwing his enemy upwards? Like, even cutting 30 ft range in half should add some fall damage in addition to the direct one - if that works. So, how should the rules work in this case? Do we cut the distance in half, don't cut it at all, do something else?

share|improve this question
    
Are you asking for a physics based answer? Like if I can throw a ball 30 feet infront of me, how many feet high can I throw it based on the pull of gravity? Or are you asking a game balance question? –  GMNoob Jan 1 at 10:06
    
I'm asking about game mechanics, since IRL physics have little to do with DnD ones 8) –  Baka-Mastermind Jan 1 at 10:10
    
Ok, but Game Physics, not game balance. Correct? –  GMNoob Jan 1 at 10:12
2  
I'm a player, and I need some RaW stuff to give to my DM, so he won't have to houserule it. Och, right, gotta add RaW to the tags x) –  Baka-Mastermind Jan 1 at 10:15
    
Just a warning about RAW with falling things: forum.rpg.net/… –  GMNoob Jan 1 at 10:49

2 Answers 2

up vote 5 down vote accepted

Rules as written, can be a bit confusing.

Taking the strongest throw Comet Throw, we have the following wording:

First take the rules from Mighty Throw:

If you succeed in tripping your foe, you throw it up to 10 feet away from you. The target falls prone in the destination space. You choose where it lands. You must place the target in an empty space. If you lack the distance to throw your target into a clear space, it falls prone in its current space.

And add the rules for Comet Throw

If you succeed in tripping your foe, you throw him up to 10 feet away from you in a direction of your choice. You select your enemy’s destination square. The target falls prone in that space and takes 4d6 points of damage. For every 5 points by which you win the opposed check, you gain an additional 5 feet of throw range. For example, if you win by 10, you can place your foe in any space within 20 feet of you. You can throw your opponent into a space occupied by a second foe. In this case, the opponent in the target square also takes 4d6 points of damage and is knocked prone. A Reflex save (DC 14 + your Str modifier) halves this damage and allows the second target to remain standing. The thrown creature then falls prone in a clear space of your choice adjacent to the second target.

It appears, that rules as written, if your DM allows places in the air to be "spaces", then you can choose a space which is over 10 feet from you in the air. For every 10 feet of space in the air, in which the target drops, it will take an additional d6 damage.

However, you have to might have to make sure that you throw it 5 feet horizontally before it is thrown five feet vertically, else the clause "it falls prone in it's current space" might takes affect and you don't get extra damage. Depending on if you read that rule as it's final destination space, or if you count the space vertically above you as it's own space.

share|improve this answer

Tome of Battle Makes Combat Better... and Sillier

Yes, when a maneuver says that the maneuver's target is moved away from the initiator, up is a valid direction away from the initiator. Most combat assume a closed environment, however, so clearance is a factor, and if the target can't be thrown into a clear space the target stays in its space.

The target might respond to the fall with immediate action if he's one available (i.e. he might've used it already; he was being attacked, after all). And, even if he does, finding a way to land safely without an epic Tumble skill check is challenging.

It's up to the DM if, as per the 1st-level Setting Sun maneuver mighty throw [strike], "[r]esolv[ing] the throw as a trip attempt" (ToB 73) is a trip attempt that actually trips. If so, according to the Rules Compendium, "A winged creature can be tripped, and if it is, it falls as if it didn’t maintain its minimum forward speed" (145), but the Rules Compendium is occasionally dubious (and, furthermore, not all flying creatures possess wings); I'd argue istead that a target the initiator launches into the air who possesses a fly speed and good or perfect maneuverability--therefore no minimum forward speed and can hover--is simply now in the air hovering (yet still technically prone) if the target doesn't want to fall, as that's more in keeping with the SRD. Nonflying creatures with worse than good maneuverability would drop 150 ft. immediately and 300 ft. each round on their turns until they hit--let's assume--the ground.

In other words, at low levels this is a valid tactic. And at high levels everyone flies anyway.


The Argument for a House Rule to Resolve the Fall on the Foe's Turn
A martial manuever is no mere bull rush-like shove or pedestrian trip attempt, else it wouldn't take magic items like martial scripts to allow even otherwise mighty warriors to perform such acts. Martial maneuvers are extraordinary (and sometimes supernatural) special abilities that at least border on the fantastic.

Thus when a creature is launched into the air by a martial manuever, he stays there. He begins his turn, prone, in that midair square, and, when his turn ends--if he hasn't done anything about his situation--, then he falls. Not only is this hilarious, but it also gives the midair creature a chance to save himself from a potentially deadly fall, gives the midair creature an opportunity to act when he's probably not surrounded by the initiator's pals, and allows the midair creature--who might otherwise possess lousy maneuverability--to do something besides stupidly falling to his death even though he has frickin' wings.

This'd be exclusively for martial maneuvers, though. If, for example, some dude gets bull rushed off a cliff in a totally mundane way, he's on his own.

This might, in some corner cases, lead to absurdity (e.g. a creature falls off a 200 ft. cliff and the initiator takes a move action to leap after him, falls the 150 ft., catches up with the creature, and performs a strike on the creature that throws the creature in a deliberate effort to suspend the creature briefly in midair), but such cases are so weird that the chances are lightning strikes.

Some DMs might like this as it saves monsters; other DMs will hate it because it's silly.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.