Take the 2-minute tour ×
Role-playing Games Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for gamemasters and players of tabletop, paper-and-pencil role-playing games. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I would really like my pally to use just ONE weapon, and wield nothing in their other hand (or at least appear to do so), but I don't really see any thing that makes it beneficial at all. Using 2 weapons or a sword and shield just seem all around better. Is there anything that adds benefits to one weapon at all? Or is there an alternative to a shield that isn't an obvious weapon, like a glove or something?

share|improve this question
Make a separate question for the second one. It is completely separate from the first question, and totally worth a question. –  Arle Camille Jan 23 '14 at 8:30
@Bubbleforhire Please confirm or clarify something for us: do you mean "one-handed" as in a character who appears to wield nothing at all in their other hand, though (as you say) they might wield, say, a glove or gauntlet? –  doppelgreener Jan 23 '14 at 8:41
I am more preferably looking for them to not wield anything in their other hand, and there actually being an incentive to do this. Like empowering the weapon they wield or somehow getting the AC bonus of the shield without actually using a shield. –  Bubbleforhire Jan 23 '14 at 8:46
Götz von Berlichingen. Maybe not precisely a paladin, at least not by his most famous quote, but well... you know. –  Damon Mar 19 '14 at 23:47

3 Answers 3

up vote 8 down vote accepted


Based on the latest playtest material of 2013.10.14 there is no incentive to leave a hand empty.

And logically, why would there be one? You have two hands, use them. If you miss a hand, just strap a shield to your forearm.

share|improve this answer
Perhaps my character only has 1 hand. –  Bubbleforhire Jan 23 '14 at 8:57
And how do you imagine losing a hand as beneficial? –  András Jan 23 '14 at 9:03
Well, I was hoping to go for the whole "Lost one sense, gained heightened other senses" kind of thing by having him have increased dexterity and strength in his one hand by allowing him to focus all his training in life on one hand rather than 2. –  Bubbleforhire Jan 23 '14 at 9:08
I am not a skilled fighter, but assuming not all our ancestors were morons, the benefits must have far outweighed the problems, because shields were used. –  András Jan 23 '14 at 12:33
@Bubbleforhire: If you DM approves you could use a 2handed in one hand while keeping the mechanic that both hands are occupied, and if you're one-armed its not that far fetched for a hero character (in my opinion) –  Lucifer Mar 17 '14 at 3:55

To offer an alternative answer to the accepted one:


Remember that role playing is not all about combat. You can have a character that only uses one hand in battle, sure! And you can have a really good time, and you can look bloody awesome at the same time.

Furthermore, having a free hand could open some possibilities in the narrative during battle, for example manipulating objects, using improvised weapons, or dragging a companion out of danger, whilst still wielding your primary weapon, GM permitting.

If you're looking for a weapon for your off-hand, on the off-chance you need it, you could opt for the Cestus, which is a type of battle glove. Here are the stats for this weapon in D&D Next:

Cestus| Simple| 1 gp| 1d4| bludgeoning| 1 lb.| Light

Perhaps your GM will permit you to have a magical cestus, which gives you a bonus to AC, or a bonus to damage with it.

If your character has lost an arm through some horrific accident, or was born one-handed, that's not the end of the adventure for that character. You can still participate in battles; you can still take part in investigations; you can still explore the ruins of that lost temple over there.

Not everything about RP is about min/maxing your character's statistical abilities. It's about telling a story, as a group, and about having a good time.

Speak to your GM and perhaps she will weave something into the campaign for you.

This answer is not specific to the paladin, but could apply equally to a paladin or most other class types.

share|improve this answer

You should take "Great Weapon Fighting" and then us a versatile weapon like long sword...then you can use it to do extra damage with two hands or just hold it in one if you like how it "looks". Also you will be able to grapple whenever you want.


share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.