Take the 2-minute tour ×
Role-playing Games Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for gamemasters and players of tabletop, paper-and-pencil role-playing games. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I am asking on a general base since I think answers might be useful for several types of characters, but if you want the details, I am currently playing a swashbuckler/duellist and I am not allowed to wear any armor nor shield, and not planning to adopt a two-weapon style. So since my off-hand is free, I was wondering what I could held to help myself.

At first, I thought about taking points in use magic device and held some rod or staff or other magic item, but I am not certain about which would be the more useful.

I also considered holding a +N dagger with the defending effect, which would give me a +N AC bonus. For example in A&E there is a defense dagger which is a +4 defending dagger with an immunity to flanking.

But I think I am probably not the first wondering on how to optimize this slot, so do you have any suggestion about this?

PS: for my particular case, allowed rulebooks are PHB I&II, DMG I&II, all Complete Xxxx books, MIC, A&E, eberron books, but if some funny suggestion exists outside those, I am also curious learning about it (might even manage negotiating it with my DM), plus I hope this question could be useful to other people as well, so don't feel restrained ;)

Thanks in advance!

EDIT: the question is maybe a little too broad, so to be clearer, I am looking at first for something that would make me more resistant, ideally something a swashbuckler is likely to held (and that the reason why I considered using a defending dagger), rather than an offensive tool, but if some item is well known being very cool to held, I might reconsider this approach, and this is why I tried to stay general in order to not orient the answers in a way that would make me miss a clever but a little off topic suggestion.

share|improve this question
    
Note that it is almost always better to make your question as specific as possible to your situation (as you have done here) rather than make it artificially broad so that it is 'more useful'. All that tends to do is invite more wishy washy and vague answers that aren't as good at solving the actual problem you have. –  Phil Mar 31 at 9:32
    
Also note that while it is possible to “optimize” the einhander style, as in making it the best einhander style possible, it is not possible to make einhander even remotely as good as other options. Any other option, really. –  KRyan Mar 31 at 12:24
    
einhander? Is that a german word for single hand or has it a more specific signification? Anyway I am also interested into it but I would rather not have to spend too many feats or levels because I already have plans for those –  Epeedefeu Mar 31 at 12:54
    
@Epeedefeu Fighting style with a weapon in one hand and the other hand empty. –  KRyan Mar 31 at 15:08

1 Answer 1

up vote 5 down vote accepted

So, You Want to Keep One Hand Empty

Spellcasting is very close to the only good reason a creature keeps a hand empty, and even then taking a free action to keep one hand on a weapon the creature usually uses two-handed still permits the creature to cast spells, as does toting (but not employing) a buckler. Besides spellcasting, though, only a handful of reasons exist ever to have a hand empty of a weapon or shield.

  • You want to steal stuff. "[T]o snatch an item worn by the target" can be a disarm, but, instead, "[i]f you try to take something from another creature, you must make a DC 20 Sleight of Hand check to obtain it" (PH 82) as a standard action. Some feats improve the Sleight of Hand skill option--the best are City of Stormreach's Master Pickpocket (95) and Dragon Compendium Volume 1's Cutpurse (95). The interesting thing about the Sleight of Hand skill check is that it can be performed as a free action by taking a -20 penalty, which is a lot, but until the DM limits your free actions, once you've a Sleight of Hand skill bonus of +20 or higher (and can avoid the attacks of opportunity that both feats eliminate) you can just steal all of every adjacent opponent's stuff... by taking, potentially, hundreds of free actions and dropping things after swiping them. This becomes even funnier if you've reach. This tactic is even tacitly encouraged by the feat Master Pickpocket, which reduces the free action Sleight of Hand check penalty from -20 to -10.

    This is actually a good reason to have an empty hand as a non-spellcaster. It is interesting, works against any gear-laden foes, stays relevant largely until the game ends, and is an appreciable combat debuff. Your DM may start limiting you, though, especially if you're doing this at low levels when the spellcasters aren't yet controlling reality, so you might want to sandbag if you can do this at, like, level 5, and--very seriously--folks will trap their gear after rumors circulate that you make enemies naked then dead instead of the reverse.

  • You've something important in that hand that's not a weapon. Wands are a good choice, but your main weapon should already have a wand chamber (Du 30, 34) (100 gp; 0 lbs.). And so should your gauntlets (PH 117-8) and your spiked armor/armor spikes (PH 116, 123-4) and, if using Complete Scoundrel, your boot blades, elbow blades, knee blades, and sleeve blades (109-10). In other words, you've enough wands all the time. Here are some other choices.

    Note that even a light shield "lets you carry other items in that hand" (PH 125), therefore many options below are also permitted while employing a light shield or a buckler (PH 124).

    • The hands item gloves of endless javelins (MIC 194) (7,000 gp; 0 lbs.) makes a +1 javelin made of force appear in your hand as a free action. I know you're not looking for weapons, but if you don't have the feat Quick Draw (PH 98) and want to mix melee attacks and ranged attack during a full attack, the gloves are cool, and it's a real reason not to carry a light shield.
    • The hands item casting glove (MIC 84) (20,000 gp; 0 lbs.) functions like an overpriced glove of storing (DMG 257) (10,000 gp; 0 lbs.) or vastly overpriced glove of the master strategist (Gh 71) (3,600 gp; 0 lbs.) until you store in it a magic item requiring activation. You can activate that item as if it were in your hand. So, yeah, if you're serious about having a hand free and keeping it free, you can. Be Spider-man and store within it a rod of ropes (CS 113, 116) (4,000 gp; 4 lbs.)
    • The infinite scrollcase (MIC 162) (2,800 gp; 3 lbs.) organizes your scrolls, makes retrieving a scroll less dangerous, enables you to hold the retrieved scroll in the same hand as the case, and grants a bonus to Concentration skill checks to cast defensively the spell on the retrieved scroll. Great if you've enough Use Magic Device skill and the DM bans one-use wands.
    • The talisman of the disk (MIC 188) (500 gp; 0 lbs.) is stunning in its versatility. The standard action employment time is miserable, however, and cuts deeply into the item's usefulness, but the price is unbeatable.
    • The sphere of awakening (MIC 186) (1,800 gp; 1 lb.) is great for what it does, but normally the party's in serious peril by the time someone has a chance to use it. Hey, look at you and your free hand.
    • The talisman of undying fortitude (MIC 188) (8,000 gp; 0 lbs.) as a swift action grants the wielder a host of immunities as if the wielder were undead. My monsters recommend this.
    • The truelight lantern (MIC 190) (36,000 gp; 3 lbs.) essentially grants your side true seeing [div] (PH 296), which you'll need by the time you can afford this.
  • You want to disarm a foe and keep his weapon. The disarm maneuver is difficult, but "[i]f you attempt the disarm while unarmed, you end up with the weapon in your hand" (PH 155), which, in addition to looking cool, in my experience also renders many warrior NPCs useless. I have never seen the disarm special attack used in a campaign to such a degree that any creature actually uses a locked gauntlet (PH 124-5), but a DM confronted with a master disarmsman will probably have the NPCs start using it. The feat Snatch Weapon (Song and Silence 40--I know!) lets you end up with the weapon in hand after a successful disarm attempt with a weapon and stab the dude from whom you took it.

  • You want to use a feat requiring a free hand. The feats Deflect Arrows (PH 93) and Snatch Arrows (PH 100), the feats Einhander (PH2 94) or Single Blade Style (Dragon Compendium Volume 1 108), and the feat-intensive Return Shot (XPH 51) all require a free hand. All but the feat Return Shot are feats on the fighter bonus feat list, accessible via the 2nd-level Sor/Wiz spell heroics [trans] (SpC 113), which has a long duration and fits cheaply in a wand.

But, yeah, you really should weaponize that empty hand. If your feats are spoken for, gloves of the balanced hand (MIC 105) (8,000 gp; 0 lbs.) allow the wearer to fight as if he had the feat Two-weapon Fighting (PH 102). If that hand still must be empty, get a fanged ring (DM 101) (10,000 gp; 0 lbs.) or bracers of striking (Mag 110-1) (1,310 gp; 1 lb.); the bracers can explicitly give your unarmed strike weapon special abilities, so go ahead and add to your hands the weapon special ability defending (DMG 224) (+1 bonus) or whatever.

share|improve this answer
    
Spellcasters can cast spells with a buckler or with a two-handed weapon (by free-action removal/replacement of the second hand for spellcasting), so spellcasting isn't really a good reason to leave the hand completely empty. –  KRyan Mar 31 at 15:12
    
I don't specifically want to keep that hand empty, I just can't wear a shield and don't plan on taking dual weapon related feats, so I am looking for something to have in my hand that is not a shield nor an offensive weapon. Anyway you provided me interesting content, I will think about it and investigate all your suggestions, thank you very much –  Epeedefeu Mar 31 at 15:29

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.