Take the 2-minute tour ×
Role-playing Games Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for gamemasters and players of tabletop, paper-and-pencil role-playing games. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I am a novice player who recently started playing D&D 3.5 with a group (who are also novices). In the game I am a druid, and this question relates to using the animal companion in combat. As we understand it, the druid needs to command her companion with a handle animal check. This check is a free action when commanding the animal to perform a trick it knows.

I roll initiative for both my own character and the animal companion. If the druid goes first then she can command the animal in her turn, but what if the animal companion goes first? Does the animal have to act on its own because the druid cannot command it to do anything, or what happens in this situation?

Possible ways this could work out:

  1. The animal companion acts out of instinct in the first round, essentially giving control to the DM.
  2. The animal companion delays in the first turn until the druid gets her turn and can command it.
  3. The druid is able to command the animal companion even if it acts before the druid.

For now we have used option 1, but we are not sure that this is the correct way to deal with the situation. As the player, obviously I would prefer 2 or 3 so I can control the companion in the first round.

Does anybody know the correct way to handle this situation?

share|improve this question
    
    
As an intelligent creature, the companion and the druid (and the rest of the druid's party) have probably worked out standard battle tactics that the companion can adhere to. I would allow the player to control the companion, with maybe an exception if the druid is surprised and the player wants the companion to do something completely out of the ordinary. –  gatherer818 Aug 3 at 20:43

3 Answers 3

up vote 9 down vote accepted

The Rules

The rules don't address this in much detail. Strictly speaking, the animal is an independent, intelligent creature and should have its own initiative. That means it's going to act on its own in the absence of a Handle Animal command. The DM gets to determine what that means.

As you noted, this is no problem if you get to go before the animal does. If the animal goes first, it can be annoying.

Why That Sucks

Most games I've played in (including the one I'm DMing right now) don't handle it that way. I find that players find the extra initiatives confusing, get unhappy when the DM has the animal do something before the player can react, and so on. You've got what is essentially a powerful class feature that you can command, except in this edge case at the start of combat where sometimes you can command it and sometimes you can't.

The people I play with love consistency, and that edge case is inconsistent.

Solving It

We solved that annoyance in two ways:

  1. Tell the DM a "default" command that you're giving the companion while you're not in combat. As it's a free action you can just keep doing it while you're wandering around town/the dungeon/whatever and have it continuously in effect. Normal ones are Heel (The animal follows you closely, even to places where it normally wouldn’t go) and Defend (The animal defends you (or is ready to defend you if no threat is present), even without any command being given). Which one depends on if you want the animal to attack something automatically if you get attacked, or to just follow and wait for your command. This removes the inconsistency, as at least the DM now knows that 6 seconds ago you told the animal to Heel in the last round, and it should probably keep doing that until you get a chance to react.
  2. House Rule - Animal Companions always start on the same initiative as their PC. Not strictly necessary, but as it makes things simple and consistent, the people I play with like it.
share|improve this answer

Free actions are taken on your turn (unless otherwise noted), so option #3 is out. Option #2 is a possibility, but by the rules not required. It does appear that option #1 is how the rules want things to go, though it does not explicitly say so anywhere.

  1. At the start of combat, all combatants roll initiative (unless something says otherwise). Nothing says otherwise for animal companions.

  2. The animal companion is a non-player character, though it is loyal to the player who owns it. It is also a trained animal. Thus, even without explicit direction, it should act according to its instincts and training. Thus, a druid should be able to train an animal companion to default to one of its tricks; with enough training (though the rules do not describe this process or how much training is actually required), one could even imagine conditional default orders (if it smells dead, guard, if it smells alive, attack).

  3. Handle Animal is a free action when used on your own animal companion, thus it happens on your turn. This allows you to change the animal companion’s behavior or direct it more specifically.

However, I have literally never met anyone who plays this way. Everyone I know just has the animal companion and the druid act on the same turn. This is similar to your option #2, except that they literally one turn, allowing things like the animal companion moving up, the druid moving up, the animal companion attacking (now with flanking!) and then the druid moving up (also flanking!). You couldn’t do that if they were separate turns.

This approach tends to speed the game up dramatically, and it more reasonably allows the player more direct control over the animal companion (since the druid is actively handling the animal’s actions). This is good because it frees the DM from worrying about what the dog “would” do in any given instance.

share|improve this answer
2  
Could the animal companion reasonably just delay and await its master's instructions? –  Hey I Can Chan Apr 11 at 13:03
1  
@HeyICanChan I’m sure that’s well within the druid’s ability to train an animal to do, sure. –  KRyan Apr 11 at 13:18

The Golden Rule of any RPG is that the rules can be bend when the players (including especially the GM) feel the need to.

I'm not sure why some other answer doesn't take this into consideration, since it's clearly a situation poorly handed by the rules.

Just either pick option #3, or do as others have already suggested and have the companion act on the same initiative as the druid... and resolve this way any other situation: if the rules don't make sense, do something else as long as you are satisfied.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.