Take the 2-minute tour ×
Role-playing Games Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for gamemasters and players of tabletop, paper-and-pencil role-playing games. It's 100% free, no registration required.

After first reading through the FC rulebook, I came to the conclusion that natural 20s and natural 1s weren't treated specially as they are in e.g. D&D. Nowhere in the standard attack, or skill check sections do they mention them.

In the places where they mention errors and threats, it specifically calls out that for it to be an error or threat, the roll must have succeeded.

So, I've been playing that way for a while, but then someone pointed out the following sentence on page 361 of the rulebook:

Statistically, 5% of all rolls fail (with a natural 1), which makes sense in isolated situations — especially dire, desperate ones.

I fired up the PDF version and found all occurrences of the word "natural" and found that to be the only place in the rulebook speaking to treating natural 1s or 20s specially.

share|improve this question

1 Answer 1

up vote 3 down vote accepted

In Fantasycraft

Rolls Don't Always Fail or Always Succeed

Your initial reading was correct. The text on page 361 is from the chapter Worlds wherein advice is given on how to run the game. The author of that section is speaking generally, assuming that a check will fail on a 1, when, in all likelihood, especially with high-level characters or NPCs, this may not be the case. If not that, it's possible the Worlds chapter was written before the game's rules were finalized.

Nothing about threats and errors in the chapters Lore, Grimoire, or Combat mentions automatic success or failure. Even saving throws don't appear to automatically fail or succeed on natural 1s or 20s, respectively.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.