Take the 2-minute tour ×
Role-playing Games Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for gamemasters and players of tabletop, paper-and-pencil role-playing games. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Our party has a level 4 gestalt Scout 4 // Ranger 1 / Swashbuckler 2 / Rogue 1

Heroforge came up with base saves of +5 +5 +0

By my calculation the scout side should offer +1 +4 +1

On the other side, level 1 Ranger: +2 +2 +0, Level 2 Swashbuckler +3 +0 +0, Level 1 Rogue +0 +2 +0 for a total on that side of +5 +4 +0

Using the Gestalt rule of using whichever side gives you the better result, I come up with a final set of saves of: +5 +4 +1

Did I do something wrong, or did Heroforge?

share|improve this question
    
Related: rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/12690/… –  Ernir Jun 29 at 16:32

1 Answer 1

up vote 7 down vote accepted

By default, the way you do this is with a level-by-level approach:

Scout 1 (+0/+2/+0) // Ranger 1 (+2/+2/+0) = +2/+2/+0

Scout 2 (+0/+1/+0) // Swashbuckler 1 (+2/+0/+0) = +2/+1/+0 (total: +4/+3/+0)

Scout 3 (+1/+0/+1) // Swashbuckler 2 (+1/+0/=0) = +1/+0/+1 (total: +5/+3/+1)

Scout 4 (+0/+1/+0) // Rogue 1 (+0/+2/+0) = +0/+2/+0 (total: +5/+5/+1)

So neither you nor Heroforge is right.

That said, these rules are dumb. They work out reasonably well for this particular build at this particular level, but there are a lot of combinations where these rules result in extremely poor bonuses for no good reason. The characters that result are inconsistent with the expectations of the system.

A better method, in general but especially with gestalt, is to incorporate Unearthed Arcana’s “fractional BAB/saves” scheme. In this, you round down after adding up your classes, rather than before. It results in a much cleaner, consistent BAB and saving throw progression.

If you use that, the progression becomes this:

Scout 1 (+⅓/+2½/+⅓) // Ranger 1 (+2½/+2½/+⅓) = +2½/+2½/+⅓

Scout 2 (+⅓/+½/+⅓) // Swashbuckler 1 (+2½/+⅓/+⅓) = +2½/+½/+⅓ (total: +5/+3/+⅔)

Scout 3 (+⅓/+½/+⅓) // Swashbuckler 2 (+½/+⅓/+⅓) = +½/+½/+⅓ (total: +5½/+3½/+1)

Scout 4 (+⅓/+½/+⅓) // Rogue 1 (+⅓/+2½/+⅓) = +⅓/+2½/+⅓ (total: +5⅚/+6/+1⅓)

And then round down for a final saving throw progression of +5/+6/+1. Minor improvement to Reflex, which makes sense because you are taking three different classes with good Reflex saves.

I also strongly recommend eliminating the repeated +2 for each time you take a new class that has a given good save (this is not a part of the Unearthed Arcana variant, however). In this case, you would miss out on the +2 from Swashbuckler 1 and Rogue 1, and have a final, rounded-down saving throw base of +3/+4/+1 – very similar to a typical, single-classed character. This way multiclassing doesn’t have weird positive or negative effects on your saving throws, aside from the natural consequences of having good or bad saving throws.

share|improve this answer
    
I agree that getting the +2's for each new class is weird. Thanks to the correction to the original RAW computation. –  PurpleVermont Jun 29 at 15:47

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.