Role-playing Games Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for gamemasters and players of tabletop, paper-and-pencil role-playing games. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I have a Warlock in my group who often wants to light things on fire, possess things, and do other improvised magical things. Should I make him do skill checks with his arcana or with his wisdom ability score? As far as I know, arcana is only used to get knowledge on magical subjects.

share|improve this question
If you want a system that handles this type of roleplay, I suggest shifting to Dungeon World. All the classes can be "reskinned", of course, (assuming you don't just find or create a custom class for the Warlock) and the Wizard actually has a ritual ability that pretty much lets them do anything they might want with magic (assuming the GM agrees its reasonable)... provided you meet some conditions, of course. – Wesley Obenshain Aug 5 '14 at 8:35
up vote 4 down vote accepted

That depends. A lot.

If it's something that he could do without magic that he's choosing to do that way for flavor, use whatever roll you would have used otherwise and describe it as magic. In cases where there wouldn't be one, just let it happen. He probably has a fire-based at-will anyway. Nothing was as onerous as the Fire-starting NWP in 2nd Ed. Failing to start a fire isn't interesting; at least not very often.

If it's something that has a significant impact or is outside the scope of the typical Warlock schtick (like possessing objects) then don't allow it. Much like Wizards are restricted by their spell books, Warlocks are restricted by their pacts. You can get around this a little bit with Wizard rituals but that's a Wizard Class Feature; not a Warlock one.

If you really insist on letting the Warlock do this or using a roll-for-magic approach it would definitely be Arcana. After all, what's going to help you cast magic better? Knowledge of magic or common sense? If you're going this route be prepared for the Fighter to start trying to cast rituals too, though. In 4th Edition, this actually makes about as much sense.

share|improve this answer
+1 for "If it's something he could do without magic." Applying some flavor to a Nature/Dungeoneering check (in the case of lighting a fire) or a Diplomacy check (in the case of a semi-possession) is a Good Thing in keeping with the approach of 4e. – Gregory Avery-Weir Aug 5 '14 at 11:50

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.