Tell me more ×
Role-playing Games Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for gamemasters and players of tabletop, paper-and-pencil role-playing games. It's 100% free, no registration required.

This is a follow up to Medieval Medicine in a Fantasy Setting?.

What could you call a medical doctor in a medieval/fantasy setting? I'm thinking along the lines of how an "alchemist" is more appropriate in a medieval/fantasy than a "chemist".

So is there an equivalent setting-appropriate term for "doctor"?

share|improve this question
Flagging to be Community Wiki – LeguRi Nov 21 '10 at 16:24
2  
I don't think a CW is necessary—there will almost certainly be a best answer. – SevenSidedDie Nov 21 '10 at 17:01
1  
I agree, CW is not needed in this case. – mxyzplk Nov 21 '10 at 22:12
Concur. It's subjective, but not that subjective. – Tynam Nov 22 '10 at 14:05
2  
@LeguRi There are all kinds of reasons to avoid CW, not least because it guts the SE system's reward cycle. Also, CW doesn't make it a better reference—already, anyone landing here is going to look over the answers and have their own opinion of what their favourite answer is. Marking it CW doesn't change that. – SevenSidedDie Dec 23 '10 at 21:08
show 1 more comment

8 Answers

Although its provenance may be suspect, the word "chirurgeon" is appropriate — it's a Renaissance back-formation of "surgeon," which dates to the 13c.

share|improve this answer

Some could be called "apothecaries". The term later took on the more narrow meaning of "pharmacist".

As I see here, they could be called exactly "doctors", or "medicine doctors", or "physicians", or maybe even "medics". The actual classification given on that link is

  1. Physicians
  2. Surgeons (or chyrurgeons, as said above)
  3. Barbers, who did common procedures such as teeth-pulling
  4. Apothecaries, the pharmacists of old
  5. Wise women, sort of "witch doctors", if you will. Also midwives, I guess.
share|improve this answer
Leech, as Dave Hallett says, looks to be a correct term for the period. – Adriano Varoli Piazza Nov 21 '10 at 17:52

The word for "doctor" in Old English is læce, i.e. "leech". It was in use at least as early as 900 AD, according to the OED, and persisted into the modern age, although by then it had become largely pejorative.

Here's a very useful article on what medieval medicine was really like and why it was more sophisticated than is often imagined.

share|improve this answer
+1. Wikipedia also mentions on its disambiguation page that "Leech" is "An old term used to refer to a doctor in medicine". – Adriano Varoli Piazza Nov 21 '10 at 17:52
2  
This is partly incorrect. The proper etymology of the word from Proto Germanic *lælijaz which means "healer, physician" and Proto Indo European *lep-agi “conjurer". The "leech" as in the parasite is folk etymology from the late middle ages. – Wyrdbrew Nov 21 '10 at 19:30
1  
Thanks for the useful information, but this is a ridiculous reason for a -1: the etymology of the word has no bearing on the original question and is rather speculative in any case. I will however edit to correct. – Dave Hallett Nov 21 '10 at 19:39
3  
@Wyrdbrew: Please don't do that, on my answers or anyone else's. Downvoting an otherwise good answer because of some minor technical issue is not helpful to the site. Much better just to leave an informative comment that can be used to improve the answer. – Dave Hallett Nov 22 '10 at 21:17
2  
Sorry you feel that the down vote was unwarrented. I don't think poor etymology is a minor technical issue. Word have orgins and those origins help us to understand their meaning. This is important. I shall do as I like. You may note that now it is corrected, I retracted my down vote and made it an up vote. – Wyrdbrew Nov 23 '10 at 16:51
show 2 more comments

I second the Chirurgeon suggestion. However, I propose you generate several names, one for each culture or social group the PCs will interact with. It's fun, for example, throwing slang names at players and letting them figure out the meanings or references.

I also doubt peasants would use the same lingo as educated nobles.

Also consider how the doctors would address each other and how they'd prefer to be addressed. That'll get you a different set of names you can use for more game flavour.

For example, there could be schools of medicine based on specialties. And while doctors would refer to each specialty by name, commoners would not make the differentiation (or know how to) and refer to them all as "Blood Letters" or somesuch.

Further, in a fantasy setting you add the element of healing magic. Shamans, priests, druids, strange monster abilities, magic items.

So, perhaps there are those who prefer the study of anatomy and critical thinking and learning over the strange and unknowable aspects of magic. This might create two factions in your campaign: the scholars who scoff at "Witch Doctors" and use derogatory names accordingly, and those with faith who think study of anatomy, surgery and such is vulgar and done by misguided or heretical "Cutters."

A funny thought just came to me. I envision a city where the "Cutters" faction digs up fresh graves from church cemeteries to pursue their study, and "Barmy Preachers" storm in to animate the dead periodically so they can get them quickly back to their sanctified graves.

Funny or not, a faction conflict between chirurgeons and priests would be fertile ground for a setting.

Have you considered fictional names? For example, use a thesaurus to generate some keywords, then use an online translator to make the words fantastic and fictional sounding.

For example, doctor, surgeon, priest, healer, medic translated to Czech becomes lékaře, chirurg, kněz, léčitel, zdravotník for your campaign.

share|improve this answer
3  
I'm not going to mark this down, because it could well be the right answer for the OP's setting in terms of atmosphere, etc. But historically, a chirurgeon is a name for a surgeon, and surgeons were considered much inferior to physicians for most of the medieval period, although this began to change towards the end of the period. See Wikipedia. It depends how historical you want to be. – Dave Hallett Nov 21 '10 at 19:59
I'd bet good money that 'lékare' has the same root as 'læce' in the answer given by Dave Hallett. – Adriano Varoli Piazza Nov 22 '10 at 11:15

A monk.

(Excuse the shortness of the answer. The other answers have made some excellent suggestions, but it's important, I think, to consider the religious angle. In medieval times, an illness was considered spiritual, as well as physical. To get healed, then, you went to a priest, and monasteries became the first hospitals.)

share|improve this answer
... then you're kind of going down the Cleric healer path, and I'm fishing for a strictly medical (non-magical) healer of sorts. – LeguRi Nov 21 '10 at 19:41
5  
@LeguRi Well, that really depends on your system and setting and whether all religious people can do miracles. Historically, many monks were medical healers, hence why so many modern hospitals are "St. Whatever Hospital". I don't recall reading anything about monastic hospitals employing Cure Light Wounds in our 12th century. ;) (Incidentally, monasteries and their "herbal medicine" is also where most of our flavoured liquors came from.) – SevenSidedDie Nov 22 '10 at 1:24
3  
@LeguRi if you want to have a medieval medicine separate from religion and mysticism, you'll have to look at another world. – Adriano Varoli Piazza Nov 22 '10 at 11:17
@SevenSidedDie - This is true; given the setting monk can still be a practitioner of medicine, but I'm hoping that the term I find here feels more self-evident that we're talking about a non-magical healer. – LeguRi Nov 22 '10 at 14:15
1  
@LeguRi Sticking with monks for a moment: hospitaller? – SevenSidedDie Nov 22 '10 at 17:00

I just remembered seeing a barber-surgeon career when flipping through Warhammer Fantasy Roleplay, which served the purpose of being a medical professional or sorts.

share|improve this answer

Medical practice as we now thing of it was not extant until the 17th Century; the various providers of medical treatment included a variety of individuals with various titles. Some of the trends

Laech, Physicker, Leech: Generally, a practitioner of Roman medicine. Leaches, salves, ointments, unguents, and caurterization, perhaps some stitching of lacerations (via thread or ant heads)

Barber: Bloodletting, some surgery, dentistry, and often potions. Plus hair and beard trimming.

Chirurgeon/Chiurgeon, Surgeon: Bone setting, bullet and arrow removal, cauterization, possibly some potions.

Chymist/Chemist/Alchemist, Pharmacist: Toxins, drugs, some antidotes, potions.

Wisewoman, Geriffa, Witch: potions, herbs, ritual.

Clergy, Friars & Monastics: prayers, herbs, some Roman medicine, Ritual.

Wife or Mother: most nursing care was simply done by the women of the house.

Note that clergy in Historical Europe had various titles.... but turning to clergy was a common resort, and many clergy of both Roman and Greek pagan faiths, as well as a surprising number of Catholic Clergy, had some practical knowledge of healing. Hospital orders often included monks or friars with backgrounds in the various other fields.

The one title that was almost unheard of: Medical Doctor. Until the renaissance, almost no colleges taught medicine. Doctor, being an academic title for one who has completed their licentiate/masters and fellowship (post masters instructional period), meant 10+ years of study in university (often from age 14). Even when medicine was taught, it was taught as part of a general arts degree, rather than a specific subject, and from Roman sources. With the early renaissance, and the Protestant Reformation, the Catholic ban on autopsy and dissection became far less often enforced, allowing many colleges to add Surgery to their list of specialties offered, and the Reformation lead also to such training being better than mere apprenticeship.

share|improve this answer
My problem with this answer is it implies that the physician (or leech) hardly knew how to do anything at all. This is a modern perspective: to their contemporaries, they were bearers of ancient knowledge, highly skilled in diagnosis and treatment. Unfortunately, they worked from the idea that health was attained by balancing bodily humors, as propounded by the Ancient Greeks. So they probably weren't very effective. But in a medieval (or probably, fantasy) setting, they would be perceived as wonderful healers. +1 however, as most of this is useful info. – Dave Hallett Nov 22 '10 at 21:54
The average army medic has far more actual skill at healing than did the average medieval physician. Despite far less training time... the apprenticeship system, coupled with a ban on actually opening people up, generally lead to persistence of ignorance, and even when some physician did develop better techniques, the seldom spread due to the secrecy aspects inherent in the Apprenticeship-Master model. And the Humors model was pretty well broken. Many later Romans knew more and wrote of it; those works, however, were willfully suppressed because of their Christian-Era Pagan authors. – aramis Nov 23 '10 at 1:58
1  
The point remains that you're seeing them through modern eyes. To the medieval mind, your "army medic" was crude and ignorant, whereas the qualified physician was a man of letters, learning and insight, probably armed with a translation of a classical text. You may well be right that the former was more effective, (although I don't think we have much direct evidence of that) but that's not at all how they were perceived. Just sayin'. – Dave Hallett Nov 23 '10 at 8:32
1  
This is probably insulting, but I want it to be funny. I hope Dave doesn't really get upset. Dave, you must be close to a thousand years old to know what the medieval mind thought, and to know how doctors of physic were perceived. Assuming that people have not gotten smarter over the past 1000 years, in the age before review boards, ordinary people trusted doctors even less than they do today. Heck, even as late as the mid 1800s, increased risk of puerperal fever kept women away from doctors when giving birth. – Sheikh Jahbooty Nov 26 '10 at 16:03

Physician. It's old-fashioned enough to avoid sounding modern, but not so archaic as to sound needlessly quirky. Actual 1100AD-1400AD vocabulary would be Middle English, a much more Germanic language which predates the Shakespearean English that we think of as "ye olde English"; as such, the "genuine" mediaeval words for "doctor" would sound out of place in a roleplaying game.

In Macbeth, Shakespeare refers to a practitioner of medicine as a "doctor of physic":

DOCTOR. Therein the patient
    Must minister to himself.
MACBETH. Throw physic to the dogs, I'll none of it.

Surgeon is another good alias. You could also use healer, although in roleplaying games this often suggests magical ability.

share|improve this answer
2  
Upvoted for the most practical approach to the problem. You want something that sounds good and medieval, without being nearly unpronounceable or, as you say, quirky. "Physician" fits the bill perfectly. – thesunneversets Nov 22 '10 at 20:27
Shakespeare used modern language for his era. All it shows is the 1550-1600 era term. – aramis Nov 23 '10 at 10:55
Also, 1500-1600 is already renaissance. – Adriano Varoli Piazza Nov 23 '10 at 14:58
Shakespeare probably isn't the best guide: he made up many words and often used obscure ones. – Graham Nov 23 '10 at 20:30
1  
@Graham: As did Gygax, of course. – Jonathan Drain Dec 12 '10 at 11:23

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.