Take the 2-minute tour ×
Role-playing Games Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for gamemasters and players of tabletop, paper-and-pencil role-playing games. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Are there restrictions for how many items a mount can carry? There is only 1 slot on the character builder for mounts. I dont understand why I cant have an enchanted saddle, and shoes. They're actually totally different areas. Thanks guys!

share|improve this question

1 Answer 1

up vote 9 down vote accepted

Yes; there is, according to the rules, only one item slot for a mount. This is why the Character Builder only allows you to have only one item on the mount.

I would agree that this is a strange limit, since there are bridle, saddle and horse shoe magic items. Each is a different part of the animal.

There isn't any reason you can't house-rule this and write items down on the character sheet. You will just have to do the math manually for these extra items.

share|improve this answer
6  
...and deal with any ensuing game-balance breakage that occurs. While I agree that the one item limitation is not an accurate reflection of reality, I also expect that WotC has leaned upon that to some extent to keep mounts from becoming overpowered. –  Iszi Feb 26 '11 at 18:49
    
Yep, that is it in a nut shell. As for over balancing, a mount is not usually used in crawl so having something that is more powerful than usual might not be too much of an issue. –  Acedrummer_CLB Feb 26 '11 at 19:08
4  
@Acedrummer_CLB: DnD - esp. 4e - is much more "game" than "simulation". I think it's the same argument about rings: "Why can I only wear two rings? I have 8 fingers and 2 thumbs!" Sure, you can invoke Rule 0 on it, but that doesn't change the intent of the rules. –  user660 Feb 26 '11 at 23:42
    
I appreciate it guys thanks! –  Stan R Feb 27 '11 at 22:46
1  
Tend to agree that balance isn't really much of an issue here - when have mounts ever been useful enough that most people use one, let alone overpowered? They always seem to simply be necessities enforced on a party that needs fast/special movement. –  mxyzplk Feb 28 '11 at 3:04

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.