Role-playing Games Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for gamemasters and players of tabletop, paper-and-pencil role-playing games. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

In D&D3e, if you successfully hit a target you always did at least 1 point of damage (before applying Damage Resistance), even if you had a Strength penalty. I can't find any mention of that rule in the 5e PHB. Does the rule no longer apply, or did I just overlook it?

share|improve this question
up vote 23 down vote accepted

It is correct to say the 3.5e rule no longer appears in 5e. Another tweet (god I wish we had that back in the 90s) clarifies that the minimum is indeed 0.

JeremyCrawford
@JeremyECrawford
There is not a damage minimum of 1, so it is possible to deal 0 damage with an attack.

Jack Abrasion
@jackAbrasion
@JeremyECrawford Do attacks do a minimum 1 point of damage, or would an unarmed strike from a goblin (STR -1) do 0 damage?

8:56 AM - 11 Jun 2015

share|improve this answer
2  
Since there is not a damage minimum, can attacks do negative damage? – GreySage Jun 27 at 17:31
2  
@GreySage That's probably better asked as a new question. – SevenSidedDie Jun 27 at 20:20
    
@GreySage I would think "negative damage" would be expressed as healing... – Jesse Cohoon Jun 28 at 3:55

There is no such rule in 5e.

An unarmed strike by someone (other than a monk or tavern brawler) with less than 10 strength will never do any damage, (even on a crit), for example.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.