Take the 2-minute tour ×
Role-playing Games Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for gamemasters and players of tabletop, paper-and-pencil role-playing games. It's 100% free, no registration required.

In Moldvay, possibly Holmes, and the retro-clone, Swords & Wizardry, Clerics simultaneously unlock 3rd and 4th level spells at the 6th experience level. They advance from 2/2 at level 5, to 2/2/1/1 at level 6.

I always put this down to a mistake, because it is gone in Mentzer. Why did Clerics advance in this way, and why is it repeated in the retro-clone S&W?

Why do Clerics then unlock 5th level spells the very next experience level (7th)?

share|improve this question
3  
"Because they do"? –  SevenSidedDie May 16 '11 at 15:50
add comment

2 Answers

You have to remember that there is only 5 spell levels in the 1974 edition of Dungeons & Dragons. And that the original edition was developed through feedback from Gygax refereeing his Greyhawk campaign.

It looks like that from level 1 to 5 the Cleric gained one new spell per level. Then with level 6, 7, & 8; the cleric gained two new spells per level. There is a jump at 9 with three new spells and winds up with 2 new spells at 10th. The cleric now has 3 spells for each spell level 1st to 5th.

If I had to guess the bump was due the fact that clerics started gaining more spells per character level starting at 6th level coupled with the fact that there are only 5 spell levels.

Since Cook was a continuation of OD&D it preserved the original bump, but in AD&D and then later Mentzer it was fixed to a smoother progression that took in account the full 7 levels of clerical spells.

share|improve this answer
    
Given that the top two spell levels get 1 each for higher levels under the original, it's easily smoothed as I noted by giving level 5 2/1/1/-/- instead of 2/2/-/-/- It's as likely a transcription error that made it to print. Cook Expert also has only 5 levels of spells... –  aramis May 16 '11 at 22:01
add comment

D&D

Moldvay only covers to level 6. Cook wrote expert. However, Moldvay states:

4 2 1st level, 1 2nd level<br>
5 2 1st level, 2 2nd level<br>
6 3 1st level, 2 2nd level

D&D Basic, p. B18

No third level clerical spells are included in Moldvay.

Cook Expert shows your hop:

L Title              Spells
1 Acolyte            - - - - -
2 Adept              1 - - - -
3 Priest (Priestess) 2 - - - -
4 Vicar              2 1 - - -
5 Curate             2 2 - - -
6 Elder              2 2 1 1 -
7 Bishop             2 2 2 1 1 

Cook, D&D Expert, p X5

Classic D&D (little brown book) also shows this hop, however

L Title          HD      Combat      Spells by Level
1 Acolyte         1      man         - - - - - -
2 Adept           2      man         1 - - - - -
3 Village Priest  3      2 men       2 - - - - -
4 Vicar           4      3 men       2 1 - - - -
5 Curate         4+1     3 men       2 2 - - - -
6 Bishop          5      Hero -1     2 2 1 1 - -
7 Lama            6      Hero        2 2 2 1 1 -

Men & Magic, p. 18. Level numbers added for clarity

It's likely a typo in the OD&D rules, and matches Cook's Expert, but note that both of those are different from Moldvay, where level 6 has no 3rd level spells.

By AD&D PH, it was fixed:

L   1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1   1 - - - - - -
2   2 - - - - - -
3   2 1 - - - - - 
4   3 2 - - - - -
5   3 3 1 - - - -
6   3 3 2 - - - -
7   3 3 2 1 - - - 

Gygax, AD&D Player's Handbook, p. 20

Likewise, in Mentzer:

 L   1 2 3 4 5 6
 1   - - - - - - 
 2   1 - - - - -
 3   2 - - - - -
 4   2 1 - - - -
 5   2 2 - - - -
 6   2 2 1 - - -
 7   3 2 2 - - -

I contacted a friend with Holmes basic; it covers ONLY levels 1-3; while it has 2nd level clerical spells, it has no provisions for characters to cast them.

S&W

Swords and Wizardry includes this jump because it was in the game it clones: classic D&D in it's brown or white cover era. S&W makes only a couple changes mechanically. None of them are in character capability, only in resolution mechanics, and the most notable being ascending AC, which is mathematically equivalent.

If you want to "fix" it

If you want a smoother progression, the following is a better fit with later lines on the chart for Classic, Moldvay, and Cook, and by extension, S&W:

L Title              Spells
1 Acolyte            - - - - -
2 Adept              1 - - - -
3 Priest (Priestess) 2 - - - -
4 Vicar              2 1 - - -
5 Curate             2 1 1 - -
6 Elder              2 2 1 1 -
7 Bishop             2 2 2 1 1 

I penciled this into a copy of Cook Expert some time around 1982...

share|improve this answer
    
I own the Cook Expert rules, and can verify it is 2/2/1/1 at level 6 as I've stated. Possibly Moldvay is compensating for not including the higher level cleric spells by simply giving more spells at those higher levels unless the Cook rules are included? Note that given all these occurences, it doesn't explain why rules released just days ago should continue the trend. –  Matt Joiner May 16 '11 at 17:09
3  
@matt The rules for S&W are a clone; they are a rewording of the processes and practices described in the original. They chose to retain the idiosyncrasy there because it's what is in the original. –  aramis May 16 '11 at 17:37
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.