Take the 2-minute tour ×
Role-playing Games Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for gamemasters and players of tabletop, paper-and-pencil role-playing games. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I never got one thing clear in the Strength to weight limit in D&D 3.5. It is well defined from the rules that with Strength 0, the character lies on the floor, unable to move. If Strength is 1, the weight limit a character can carry is in the order of some kilogram, say 5 kg (sorry I don't have the table at hand).

Is this amount in addition to the intrinsic weight of the character himself, or not ? In other words, is a character with Strength 1 but weighting 15 kg able to propel himself forward ?

share|improve this question
add comment

2 Answers

up vote 11 down vote accepted

Since the rules are specifically mentioning weapons, armor, and equipment when it comes to carrying capacity it can be assumed that the character's body weight does not factor into carrying capacity. If body weight were to be accounted for, then most characters would need a strength score in the mid-20's at least to not be encumbered (at least based on the chart on D&D Wiki).

share|improve this answer
add comment

Good question. I assume you mean Strength. The short answer is, no, you're character's own weight doesn't count against encumberance.

Being unable to move at 0 Strength is probably a special case, like being at 0 hit points and being reduced to a partial action. I looked it up in the Pathfinder core rulebook, and it seems like it isn't well-defined. I'm trying to find my regular 3.5 book to see if it's mentioned there. I noticed in the Ray of Enfeeblement spell description (Pathfinder version), it can't reduce a character's Strength below 1.

Edit

I found my DMG. The rules are definite:

"Strength 0 means that the character cannot move at all. He lies helpless on the ground." (p. 289, Ability Score Loss, in the Glossary)

share|improve this answer
2  
And, at STR 1, he probably can't lift the weight of his own gear, even with his maximum lifting capacity. So, he might not be able to move until he gets rid of some of it. –  RMorrisey Aug 22 '10 at 21:28
    
Yes. sorry, got an italian-speaking evening and I mixed up the vocabulary. –  Stefano Borini Aug 22 '10 at 21:39
    
Edited with the official rule from the DMG –  RMorrisey Aug 22 '10 at 23:11
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.