Role-playing Games Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for gamemasters and players of tabletop, paper-and-pencil role-playing games. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I've been getting my friends into Paranoia, and so far they seem to love playing as Troubleshooters.

I've been looking through the IntSec and High Programmer books too. While Intsec fundamentally seems a lot like Troubleshooter, High Programmer is totally different. High Programmer focuses on politics over zany slapstick and has a totally different method of play.

I'm wondering from those of you who have played, what are the good parts and the bad parts of it? How does it play differently than Troubleshooter? And how RP heavy is it? It seems more so than Troubleshooter or Intsec, but I'm not completely sure.

share|improve this question
@Gorelab: I've tried to edit your question so that it's more clear what you are asking. If I've mucked it up and it's not asking what you want, please revert my edit. – Simon Withers Sep 4 '11 at 20:36

I have not played either, however there is a thread on that discusses many of the same things: The RPG.NET thread on the topic

However, on reading it only the first comment is useful to you, so I am going to quote the relevant parts here:

Troubleshooters is the 25th Anniversary edition of the Mongoose 2004 PARANOIA rulebook (formerly known as XP). There are minor tweaks to the rules, but it is basically the same game. Likewise, the companion Internal Security rulebook uses the same system, though there is extensive new material there for BLUE-Clearance IntSec missions. Neither is mechanically complex, and both place unique emphasis on the Gamemaster's supremacy. Every rule in both books exists as a non-mandatory advisory to the GM's incontrovertible authority.

In contrast, High Programmers is a completely different game with an unusual and innovative rules system. It isn't necessarily complex, but the players have more options and hence a greater cognitive load than in Troubleshooters or IntSec.

Each book offers copious advice on designing missions, plus pregenerated player characters. Troubleshooters, in particular, adapts the XP GM Screen's "mission blender," a collection of tables that lets you generate an entire mission randomly with the roll of a mere five dozen or so d20s. Troubleshooters also includes Ken Rolston's classic introductory PARANOIA mission "Robot Imana-665-C" as well as a fine new mission by Gareth Hanrahan, "The Quantum Traitor." High Programmers includes one mission, "Disaster Management."

Allen Varney, 04-16-2010

Other comments in that thread indicate that the Official Paranoia Development Blog has information on the designers goals with each system.

I hope this helps, it seemed a shame to have this thread with no answers for so long.

share|improve this answer
This doesn't really answer the question. It does say that there are differences between High Programmer and Troubleshooter, but it doesn't actually describe what those differences are. – GMJoe Jul 7 '14 at 6:47
@GMJoe Yeah, looking over it again it isn't a great answer. It establishes they are different product lines, but nothing else. The development blog might have more. Also: My answer hasn't been accepted, so hopefully a better one will come along. – Canageek Jul 7 '14 at 19:02

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.