Tag Info

New answers tagged

4

A lawful character abides by a specific set of rules, laws, or a particular code. Which rules, laws, or code the character follows is decided by the character at some point in time, either explicitly or implicitly. A paladin, for example, follows a code in the form of a vow that he or she has taken. Most commonly, this is a vow to a Lawful Good god, but it ...


-3

The Initial Question Assuming D&D/Pathfinder's 3x3 alignment system, I would call this a Lawful Good action, although a bit mean to the mayor. It's Good because you helped others at the cost of your own benefit. You gave up 420gp so that each citizen could get a few silver, which is unlikely to get you particularly improved treatment in town. It's ...


0

That sounds chaotic good to me, so I'd say you were playing your alignment. You're trying to make sure that the church is repaired and the people get their money, which is good, but you're doing so in a way that doesn't respect the existing power structure or etiquette - just yelling it out in front of a crowd as opposed to discussing with the mayor or ...


6

The best way to make alignment work is not to overthink it, and don’t try to enforce it. Alignment has only a few mechanical effects in the game, which apply mainly to creatures with an obvious metaphysical affinity (outsiders, undead, clerics). Alignment doesn’t determine how characters behave, as it describes only very general tendencies, whereas ...


7

I agree with KRyan that D&D would be better served if alignment were thrown out wholesale. However, I don't think that treating Good and Evil as arbitrary labels if you keep them in (like subtypes) is the best idea -- first and foremost, because we have subtypes, and that's literally what they do. Replacing the axes with another such as the BRACI grid ...


11

Per the challenging the frame meta, I will endeavor to answer this question straight, first. But I want it to be clear that I think the best approach to alignment isn’t to “make it work” but to throw it out altogether. If you insist on having alignment, however, the best approach I have seen, that allows for internal consistency and ...


5

One possibility is to redefine the alignment system's axes. My personal favorite is the BRACI Grid, which uses Responsible/Authoritarian and Collectivism/Individualism as it's two axes. Replacing / Redefining the Law-Chaos Axis, I introduce Collectivism (C) standing in for Law, and Individualism (I) standing in for Chaos. Collectivism values the ...


-1

The phrase "Every move by the character would be highly calculated" suggest to me that the character is actually Lawful. Law is about order and self-discipline and planning and predictability and reliability. Chaos is about freedom and flexibility and adaptability and unpredictability and free-spiritedness. A Chaotic being is just not capable of long-term ...


15

The motives and actions you've described are not presciptively tied to any alignment; alignment is fuzzy enough that he can be justified as having any alignment you wish to choose for him. Both fame and fortune are unaligned motivations, that is, not really solidly towards any particular alignment, including True Neutral or any other kind of Neutral. Fame ...


7

Sure - For a While A chaotic neutral character could do some occasional good acts in order to further his own goals, whatever those might be. Here's the description of Chaotic Neutral: A chaotic neutral character follows his whims. He is an individualist first and last. He values his own liberty but doesn’t strive to protect others’ freedom. So ...



Top 50 recent answers are included