Tag Info

New answers tagged

-3

As a DM I would allow it Linguistics "Transform" means change shape. Balance By the time you have enough levels to find a +2 weapon, you have enough levels to use a +2 weapon. Indicator While handing out near-useless items is bad, motivating everyone to take 3 levels of Warlock is worse. I would still allow it, to see if my non-warlock players want to ...


2

Officially you would be stuck with a doubled feat that is redundant. House rules is how I usually deal with this. I have this question come up all the time. While some people prefer to try and plot out the course of their characters development ahead of time, many of us aren't that far sighted. In another case your tastes could change and the turns you ...


6

There is a way to trade a set of feats for a set of class abilities. Many class features that can normally only be gained by taking levels in a class that grant them can be gained by the new variant multiclassing rules in Pathfinder Unchained, allowing you to trade a significant portion of your feats for certain benefits from a specific class. I don't ...


7

There is not. Don’t really know what else to say here; I can’t prove a negative. But as a generic, “pick anything” feat, no, there is not and never will be. Certain class features are available as feats, usually in a somewhat modified (often limited) form.


31

Officially, you have the feat twice and they do not stack You cannot generally select a feat that you already have, but if you are granted a feat you already have, you end up with two. Unless the feat has a Special section saying that it stacks with itself, it does not. Weapon Finesse does not say this, so the two copies of Weapon Finesse are redundant. ...


10

The Player's Handbook II includes a chapter on rebuilding characters (p. 191). Replacing feats is considered "small-scale" and the chapter suggests that simple retraining is enough - done in the background during downtime for instance. For rationale, a short quote (p. 192): For players and DMs who are accustomed to treating character creation and ...


8

You get the feat twice, but nothing happens Feat Descriptions in the subsection Benefit says that If a character has the same feat more than once, its benefits do not stack unless indicated otherwise in the description. In general, having a feat twice is the same as having it once. (Player's Handbook 89). However, a generous DM may allow you to use ...


5

It was your call to make as DM, and you have valid grounds on which to make it There is a RAW reason this doesn't necessarily work on a stirge: it says that it works via us[ing] your wit to distract, confuse, and otherwise sap the confidence and competence of others. As I imagine you judged, a stirge is pretty impervious to distracting or confusing ...


18

There is no RAW reason to suggest it doesn't work. Despite the flavor being used "use your wit to distract, confuse, or otherwise sap confidence", the only restrictions placed on this spell are : The creature is immune if it can’t hear you or if it’s immune to being charmed." Furthermore, the Bard's abilities are generally described as hiding magic beneath ...


6

Yes; Whirling Frenzy does not list an exception to the general multiple-attack rule I suppose, on some level, you have your extra attack even if you don’t full attack, but you cannot use it unless you full attack because of this rule: Combat > Actions in Combat > Full-round Actions > Full Attack If you get more than one attack per round [...] for some ...


7

No A 5th-level runesmith knows the secret of inscribing a permanent rune of a single chosen spell into his flesh. Also, Permanent Rune does not mean you continuously benefit from the spell’s effect, it just means you can cast the spell twice per day as a spell-like ability. Not awful by any means, but not particularly exciting.



Top 50 recent answers are included