New answers tagged feats
0
I think I have made my decision to help Abacus the Rogue to maximize his sneak attack , I think Combat Reflexes as it fits with 2 weapon fighting, will be my choice, as it also stacks with all other to hit feats, will be Abacus's best choice for survival at 7th level as it adds a extra attacks and attacks of opportunity , all the others are 6 base attack ...
0
You can take Weapon Focus et al. in Natural Weapons
So the admittedly convoluted status of the Unarmed Strike is unimportant: even if you do call it a natural weapon, it’s still eligible for Weapon Focus.
The Unarmed Strike is generally treated as a natural weapon for the purposes of spell effects and feats (if you are a Monk, you also get to treat ...
7
Well, if you read the feats, they all explicitly say that you can! Each contains the following line:
You can also choose unarmed strike or grapple as your weapon for purposes of this feat.
So your specific question is easy. A more general question is if that line is necessary -- and I'd say it isn't. The rules consistently treat unarmed strike as ...
4
There's no RAW on this that I can find
Which I realize is every kind of unhelpful, but I thought I'd make this clear: at no point did anyone actually bother defining what "temporary ability score" actually means.
With that in mind...
The spell goes through all the fuss and bother to not make it an ability score bonus, which it could have very easily done ...
6
Greenbound Summoning works exactly as it says it does: you get a normal creature from the list, augmented with the Greenbound template. It “has” the LA/CR adjustment but that doesn’t really mean much of anything to a summoned creature anyway.
On the one hand, the Greenbound template is over-LA’d. Like most LA-carrying options, ...
10
It is broken for the reasons you note (way, way awesome results from a first level spell for having one feat - better than any other summoning augmentation available). There's a good reason for this - the author intended it to be a +2 level metamagic feat but that was omitted when it appeared in print.
10
You're only casting the spell once, so the cost is not affected.
Now, neither stoneskin nor wish actually meet the criteria for Chain Spell. To apply the feat, the spell must:
"specify a single target"
have "a range greater than touch"
Stoneskin has a range of touch, and spells like wish or miracle don't specify a single target. (You can use them on a ...
2
RAW, they are free. Chain Spell is specific about what happens, and expensive/XP components are required to cast a spell, not to affect a target. Absent any special rule in Chain Spell (of which there is none), they do not get duplicated.
Whether or not this is a problem is hard to say. You don't obviate the cost entirely; hitting more targets usually ...
6
You use your materials once: mainly simply because it doesn't specify otherwise.
Any spell that specifies a single target and has a range greater than touch can be chained so as to affect that primary target normally, then arc to a number of secondary targets equal to your caster level (maximum 20).
Chain Spell involves casting your spell once on one ...
-3
What, precisely, happens when you apply the Chain Spell metamagic feat to the Chain Lightning Spell?
I also think you can't but for a somewhat different reason than KRyan:
I would say the Chain Lightning spell is the result of someone incorporating the Chain Spell feat into the Lightning spell.
Since the feat doesn't stack you can't apply it again.
Edit: Yes, I realize the spell came first. I'm trying to make a reasonable interpretation of the ...
12
What, precisely, happens when you apply the Chain Spell metamagic feat to the Chain Lightning Spell?
I don’t think you can
Chain Spell says a spell that specifies a single target, and chain lightning specifies more than a single target. They don’t seem to work together.
The most reasonable interpretation, assuming you wanted it to work, is just to have two separate chains: the chain lightning one, and the Chain Spell one. Strictly speaking, ...
5
Bonuses of Different Types Stack
So Racial and Feat and Item bonuses all stack with one another. Thus, in the first case, you do get +4 to AC, as well as +2 to Fort/Ref/Will. And in the second case, yes, the bonus does stack with the Tusk Shield.
As for the Tusk Shield, yes, it means for Opportunity Attacks. As long as you are in the process of charging, ...
Top 50 recent answers are included
