| bio | website | last.fm/user/boersnoes |
|---|---|---|
| location | Antwerp, Belgium | |
| age | 28 | |
| visits | member for | 2 years, 9 months |
| seen | Apr 10 at 11:34 | |
| stats | profile views | 16 |
Junior programmer. Belgium based.
|
Mar 17 |
awarded | Popular Question |
|
Mar 14 |
awarded | Popular Question |
|
Aug 31 |
awarded | Yearling |
|
Jun 20 |
awarded | Good Question |
|
May 3 |
comment |
Is this charge-based build legal? I like the idea of putting a name on their heads :) |
|
Apr 15 |
comment |
Is this charge-based build legal? @Eagle Are there such auras? From memory I would say that most auras are "when the target starts its turn in the aura" |
|
Apr 14 |
comment |
Is this charge-based build legal? Also, think I'm going to check this "play dirty" thing out. Thx :) |
|
Apr 14 |
accepted | Is this charge-based build legal? |
|
Apr 14 |
comment |
Is this charge-based build legal? Yes, I throw in some different encounters on a regular basis. As a matter of fact because I wanted to make each combat unique I had to come up with quite elaborate plots. So elaborate they became unplayable. That's why recently I tuned it down a little and started to throw in more "regular" encounters. |
|
Apr 14 |
comment |
Is this charge-based build legal? How exactly would you use marks and reach? |
|
Apr 14 |
comment |
Is this charge-based build legal? Diff terrain is indeed something to consider as it not only slows them, but makes charging illegal. |
|
Apr 14 |
comment |
Is this charge-based build legal? Does an aura keep them from charging? Sounds logical. I'll have to look that up. |
|
Apr 14 |
comment |
Is this charge-based build legal? They have feats that make them immune to AoO during charge. They also rely heavily on shifting before and after charges, so that sadly rules out the AoO rule. |
|
Apr 14 |
comment |
Is this charge-based build legal? I too thought it would be logical that reach weapons would have a larger threat reach. But PHB says they don't ;) |
|
Apr 14 |
comment |
Is this charge-based build legal? Thanks for the answer. These are indeed valid points. The hard point is not making every encounter about nerfing their charge abilities. It will frustrate them too. But I'm starting to think that's the nature of "one-trick-ponies" as you aptly called them. |
|
Apr 13 |
revised |
Is this charge-based build legal? added 33 characters in body; added 2 characters in body; added 4 characters in body |
|
Apr 13 |
asked | Is this charge-based build legal? |
|
Dec 22 |
comment |
Are there serious drawbacks in being Deafened? I meant the latter. Eg: Shadow Hound's Baying: deafened creatures are immune |
|
Dec 21 |
awarded | Teacher |
|
Dec 21 |
answered | Are there serious drawbacks in being Deafened? |