| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 8 months |
| seen | May 18 at 16:53 | |
| stats | profile views | 11 |
|
May 10 |
comment |
Would this Technomancer concept be plausible? I suppose that would make sense; although it wouldn't really require any special skill to talk how he does, it would be kinda cool to build his abilities around the idea of hacking and controlling devices to fit the theme. And I suppose his voice wouldn't always have to be voice edits; I imagine he would use a Stephen Hawkings-esque synthesizer for normal speech but sprinkle in edits and other sound bytes if he so chooses. |
|
May 10 |
accepted | Would this Technomancer concept be plausible? |
|
May 10 |
asked | Would this Technomancer concept be plausible? |
|
May 7 |
comment |
Do the 3.5 books ask you to refer to 3.0 books? Awesome. Now if only I could tell what the deal is with this "Sword and Sorcery" stuff they got tons of when we sent them to get DnD 3.5 books. |
|
May 7 |
asked | Do the 3.5 books ask you to refer to 3.0 books? |
|
May 5 |
comment |
Questions about Improved Familiar advancement Ah, ok. Similar question: is it possible to start with a larger version of the monster based on your HD total when you obtained the familiar? |
|
May 5 |
accepted | Questions about Improved Familiar advancement |
|
May 5 |
asked | Questions about Improved Familiar advancement |
|
May 2 |
comment |
Can you use more than one martial maneuver in a single round? I noticed Master of Nine lets you use Dual Stance, too, but the qualification requirements don't make it seem all that worthwhile. |
|
May 2 |
comment |
Can you use more than one martial maneuver in a single round? Ah, that's good. Now the Swordsage class feature of being able to apply two boosts at once suddenly becomes more interesting. |
|
May 2 |
accepted | Can you use more than one martial maneuver in a single round? |
|
May 1 |
asked | Can you use more than one martial maneuver in a single round? |
|
May 1 |
comment |
How many natural weapon attacks would I get? I'm not sure you got what I meant; for paired weapons, each part of the pair usually deals the same amount of damage, so though you're rolling attacks for one of them, so though you are rolling up to four extra attacks for one of them, in-universe you may be alternating between hands with each successive attack as opposed to just flailing about with one of them. It doesn't change the total number of extra attacks you get, just the mental image the feat's result evokes. |
|
May 1 |
comment |
How many natural weapon attacks would I get? I think it only applies to a paired set of natural weapons, i.e. claws, but you only get the bonuses for the pair and not the individual claws, like you're alternating between them with each successive hit. |
|
Apr 30 |
comment |
How many natural weapon attacks would I get? I still think 4 attacks by way of alternating between the pair would make sense, since they're theoretically the same damage and doing 1-2-1-2 slash combos makes more sense than 1-2-1-1-1, for example. |
|
Apr 30 |
comment |
How many natural weapon attacks would I get? Well, it does consistently mention a need for "at least one pair of natural weapons", so maybe it refers to only getting extra attacks from one pair? |
|
Apr 30 |
accepted | How many natural weapon attacks would I get? |
|
Apr 29 |
asked | How many natural weapon attacks would I get? |
|
Apr 28 |
comment |
Question about the Bag of Endless Caltrops I just thought being able to stockpile caltrops for covering large areas in single turns might be useful. ...and now I also picture rolling purple on a Prismatic spell sending someone to the Demielemental Plane of Caltrops. |
|
Apr 28 |
accepted | Question about the Bag of Endless Caltrops |