Skip to main content
Commonmark migration
Source Link

#RAW - Probably not.

RAW - Probably not.

The staff creates a swarm of :

...harmless flying insects...

Thus, there are 2 characteristics of the insects created: they are both harmless and flying.

The second Giant Insect ability is limited to:

...up to ten centipedes, three spiders, five wasps, or one scorpion...

The only one of these that is flying are the wasps. It would then come down to an interpretation of the word "harmless" and as a DM I would probably rule that wasps would widely considered to be harmful insects (especially when compared to the harmless gnat-like creatures I would envision as being created on a plain reading and imagining of insect swarm. A swarm of wasps are also included in the MM with a CR of 1/2, so I don't think they would be "harmless").

#RAI - Probably not.

RAI - Probably not.

Here it would again come down to the word "harmless". In the grand scheme of harms in a magical DnD world, wasps could be characterized as harmless, especially since a level 1 character would presumably be able to kill wasps without taking much damage (if any).

As such, I could see a DM being open to an argument along these lines, though ultimately I would probably still rule against it. The language describing the Staff of Swarming Insects likely would have been clearer if this was indeed the intention of the game designers (eg "you may turn up to 10 of these insects into a giant version of any of the following: 10 centipedes..."). It is also important to remember that a swarm of wasps is dangerous to lower level characters (especially level 1 characters). So while I would rule it could not be used in this way, it would ultimately be up to the DM.

#RAW - Probably not.

The staff creates a swarm of :

...harmless flying insects...

Thus, there are 2 characteristics of the insects created: they are both harmless and flying.

The second Giant Insect ability is limited to:

...up to ten centipedes, three spiders, five wasps, or one scorpion...

The only one of these that is flying are the wasps. It would then come down to an interpretation of the word "harmless" and as a DM I would probably rule that wasps would widely considered to be harmful insects (especially when compared to the harmless gnat-like creatures I would envision as being created on a plain reading and imagining of insect swarm. A swarm of wasps are also included in the MM with a CR of 1/2, so I don't think they would be "harmless").

#RAI - Probably not.

Here it would again come down to the word "harmless". In the grand scheme of harms in a magical DnD world, wasps could be characterized as harmless, especially since a level 1 character would presumably be able to kill wasps without taking much damage (if any).

As such, I could see a DM being open to an argument along these lines, though ultimately I would probably still rule against it. The language describing the Staff of Swarming Insects likely would have been clearer if this was indeed the intention of the game designers (eg "you may turn up to 10 of these insects into a giant version of any of the following: 10 centipedes..."). It is also important to remember that a swarm of wasps is dangerous to lower level characters (especially level 1 characters). So while I would rule it could not be used in this way, it would ultimately be up to the DM.

RAW - Probably not.

The staff creates a swarm of :

...harmless flying insects...

Thus, there are 2 characteristics of the insects created: they are both harmless and flying.

The second Giant Insect ability is limited to:

...up to ten centipedes, three spiders, five wasps, or one scorpion...

The only one of these that is flying are the wasps. It would then come down to an interpretation of the word "harmless" and as a DM I would probably rule that wasps would widely considered to be harmful insects (especially when compared to the harmless gnat-like creatures I would envision as being created on a plain reading and imagining of insect swarm. A swarm of wasps are also included in the MM with a CR of 1/2, so I don't think they would be "harmless").

RAI - Probably not.

Here it would again come down to the word "harmless". In the grand scheme of harms in a magical DnD world, wasps could be characterized as harmless, especially since a level 1 character would presumably be able to kill wasps without taking much damage (if any).

As such, I could see a DM being open to an argument along these lines, though ultimately I would probably still rule against it. The language describing the Staff of Swarming Insects likely would have been clearer if this was indeed the intention of the game designers (eg "you may turn up to 10 of these insects into a giant version of any of the following: 10 centipedes..."). It is also important to remember that a swarm of wasps is dangerous to lower level characters (especially level 1 characters). So while I would rule it could not be used in this way, it would ultimately be up to the DM.

clarified second part of answer based on comments
Source Link

#RAW - Probably not.

The staff creates a swarm of :

...harmless flying insects...

Thus, there are 2 characteristics of the insects created: they are both harmless and flying.

The second Giant Insect ability is limited to:

...up to ten centipedes, three spiders, five wasps, or one scorpion...

The only one of these that is flying are the wasps. It would then come down to an interpretation of the word "harmless" and as a DM I would probably rule that wasps would widely considered to be harmful insects (especially when compared to the harmless gnat-like creatures I would envision as being created on a plain reading and imagining of insect swarm. A swarm of wasps are also included in the MM with a CR of 1/2, so I don't think they would be "harmless").

#RAI - MaybeProbably not.

There may be an argument here. Again,Here it would again come down to the word "harmless". In the grand scheme of harms in a magical DnD world, wasps could easily be characterized as harmless, especially since a level 1 character would presumably be able to kill wasps without taking much damage (if any).

As such, asI could see a DM I would bebeing open to an argument along these lines, though ultimately I would probably still rule against it, if only because theI would probably still rule against it. The language describing the Staff of Swarming Insects likely couldwould have been clearer if this was indeed the intention of the game designers (eg "you may turn up to 10 of these insects into a giant version of any of the following: 10 centipedes..."). It is also important to remember that a swarm of wasps is dangerous to lower level characters (especially level 1 characters). So while I would rule it could not be used in this way, it would ultimately be up to the DM.

#RAW - Probably not.

The staff creates a swarm of :

...harmless flying insects...

Thus, there are 2 characteristics of the insects created: they are both harmless and flying.

The second Giant Insect ability is limited to:

...up to ten centipedes, three spiders, five wasps, or one scorpion...

The only one of these that is flying are the wasps. It would then come down to an interpretation of the word "harmless" and as a DM I would probably rule that wasps would widely considered to be harmful insects (especially when compared to the harmless gnat-like creatures I would envision as being created on a plain reading and imagining of insect swarm. A swarm of wasps are also included in the MM with a CR of 1/2, so I don't think they would be "harmless").

#RAI - Maybe.

There may be an argument here. Again, it would come down to the word "harmless". In the grand scheme of harms in a magical DnD world, wasps could easily be characterized as harmless, especially since a level 1 character would presumably be able to kill wasps without taking much damage (if any).

As such, as a DM I would be open to an argument along these lines, though ultimately I would probably still rule against it, if only because the language describing the Staff of Swarming Insects likely could have been clearer if this was indeed the intention of the game designers (eg "you may turn up to 10 of these insects into a giant version of any of the following: 10 centipedes...").

#RAW - Probably not.

The staff creates a swarm of :

...harmless flying insects...

Thus, there are 2 characteristics of the insects created: they are both harmless and flying.

The second Giant Insect ability is limited to:

...up to ten centipedes, three spiders, five wasps, or one scorpion...

The only one of these that is flying are the wasps. It would then come down to an interpretation of the word "harmless" and as a DM I would probably rule that wasps would widely considered to be harmful insects (especially when compared to the harmless gnat-like creatures I would envision as being created on a plain reading and imagining of insect swarm. A swarm of wasps are also included in the MM with a CR of 1/2, so I don't think they would be "harmless").

#RAI - Probably not.

Here it would again come down to the word "harmless". In the grand scheme of harms in a magical DnD world, wasps could be characterized as harmless, especially since a level 1 character would presumably be able to kill wasps without taking much damage (if any).

As such, I could see a DM being open to an argument along these lines, though ultimately I would probably still rule against it. The language describing the Staff of Swarming Insects likely would have been clearer if this was indeed the intention of the game designers (eg "you may turn up to 10 of these insects into a giant version of any of the following: 10 centipedes..."). It is also important to remember that a swarm of wasps is dangerous to lower level characters (especially level 1 characters). So while I would rule it could not be used in this way, it would ultimately be up to the DM.

grammar
Source Link

#RAW - Probably not.

The staff creates a swarm of :

harmless...harmless flying insects...

Thus, there are 2 characteristics of the insects created: they are both harmless and flying.

The second Giant Insect ability is limited to:

up...up to ten centipedes, three spiders, five wasps, or one scorpion...

The only one of these that is flying are the wasps. It would then come down to an interpretation of the word "harmless" and as a DM I would probably rule that wasps would widely considered to be harmful insects (especially when compared to the harmless gnat-like creatures I would envision as being created on a plain reading and imagining of insect swarm. TheyA swarm of wasps are also included in the MM with a CR of 1/2, so I don't think they would be "harmless").

#RAI - Maybe.

There may be an argument here. Again, it would come down to the word "harmless". In the grand scheme of harms in a magical DnD world, wasps could easily be characterized as harmless, especially since a level 1 character would presumably be able to kill wasps without taking much damage (if any).

As such, as a DM I would be open to an argument along these lines, though ultimately I would probably still rule against it, if only because the language describing the Staff of Swarming Insects likely could have been clearer if this was indeed the intention of the game designers (eg "you may turn up to 10 of these insects into a giant version of any of the following: 10 centipedes...").

#RAW - Probably not.

The staff creates a swarm of :

harmless flying insects

Thus, there are 2 characteristics of the insects created: they are both harmless and flying.

The second ability is limited to:

up to ten centipedes, three spiders, five wasps, or one scorpion.

The only one of these that is flying are the wasps. It would then come down to an interpretation of the word "harmless" and as a DM I would probably rule that wasps would widely considered to be harmful insects (especially when compared to the harmless gnat-like creatures I would envision as being created on a plain reading and imagining of insect swarm. They are also included in the MM with a CR of 1/2).

#RAI - Maybe.

There may be an argument here. Again, it would come down to the word "harmless". In the grand scheme of harms in a magical DnD world, wasps could easily be characterized as harmless, especially since a level 1 character would presumably be able to kill wasps without taking damage.

As such, as a DM I would be open to an argument along these lines, though ultimately I would probably still rule against it, if only because the language describing the Staff of Swarming Insects likely could have been clearer if this was indeed the intention of the game designers (eg "you may turn up to 10 of these insects into a giant version of any of the following: 10 centipedes...").

#RAW - Probably not.

The staff creates a swarm of :

...harmless flying insects...

Thus, there are 2 characteristics of the insects created: they are both harmless and flying.

The second Giant Insect ability is limited to:

...up to ten centipedes, three spiders, five wasps, or one scorpion...

The only one of these that is flying are the wasps. It would then come down to an interpretation of the word "harmless" and as a DM I would probably rule that wasps would widely considered to be harmful insects (especially when compared to the harmless gnat-like creatures I would envision as being created on a plain reading and imagining of insect swarm. A swarm of wasps are also included in the MM with a CR of 1/2, so I don't think they would be "harmless").

#RAI - Maybe.

There may be an argument here. Again, it would come down to the word "harmless". In the grand scheme of harms in a magical DnD world, wasps could easily be characterized as harmless, especially since a level 1 character would presumably be able to kill wasps without taking much damage (if any).

As such, as a DM I would be open to an argument along these lines, though ultimately I would probably still rule against it, if only because the language describing the Staff of Swarming Insects likely could have been clearer if this was indeed the intention of the game designers (eg "you may turn up to 10 of these insects into a giant version of any of the following: 10 centipedes...").

Source Link
Loading