Timeline for Problematic Players Help (3/3); Double Edgy Players
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2020 at 10:23 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Jan 9, 2018 at 15:42 | comment | added | Secespitus | @DarthPseudonym My Guy Syndrome | |
| Jan 9, 2018 at 15:41 | comment | added | Darth Pseudonym | @TemporalWolf Serious "Metal Gear Solid"? Sorry, what's that abbreviation? | |
| Jan 8, 2018 at 21:53 | comment | added | TemporalWolf | We don't normally have a Session 0, as the majority of us have been gaming together for years. But we recently had a session 100.5 (or an hour long addendum after one of our sessions) because one of our members has been having some serious MGS. It helped, immensely. | |
| Jan 8, 2018 at 19:16 | comment | added | Darth Pseudonym | I'd suggest that if you're doing a session X.5 to re-establish and re-align campaign expectations, and especially because you have some newb players, include an up front option to rejigger character build choices. It can be disheartening for a new player to feel they've wasted their choices, and that can lead to doubling-down on the previously specified character choices -- it's easier to say 'Yeah well I'm doing it anyway!' than to back down if you feel like you're heavily invested in the previous choices. | |
| Jan 8, 2018 at 15:59 | comment | added | JP Chapleau | I really like your suggestion of a session X.5. This could really serve to realign people to the story, whether taking them on or off the train... | |
| Jan 8, 2018 at 14:18 | history | answered | Secespitus | CC BY-SA 3.0 |