Timeline for Should I change the entire campaign to please one player?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 7, 2018 at 1:28 | history | edited | Icyfire | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 440 characters in body
|
| Feb 7, 2018 at 1:10 | history | edited | Icyfire | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 119 characters in body
|
| Feb 6, 2018 at 23:02 | history | edited | Icyfire | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 357 characters in body
|
| Feb 6, 2018 at 22:05 | comment | added | Darth Pseudonym | I agree with Steve, I suspect this guy isn't actually going to leave, but is trying to use that threat as a bludgeon to make you change your game. He may not even have a goal or end-state in mind, it's just a way to exert control over another human being, in particular one who has some modicum of control over him (in that you are running the game). This does not sound like a player who is trying to address problems in good faith, so I have a feeling it's a manipulative threat more than an actual intent to leave. I'd say you should warn the other players, and then stop trying to accommodate. | |
| Feb 6, 2018 at 21:18 | comment | added | Steve-O | Excellent answer. I would only add that the OP might want to have a plan in place for what to do in the event that The Druid doesn't actually leave of his own accord. He may just hang around complaining and threatening to leave without actually doing so, and that would presumably continue to annoy the OP long after he has stopped trying to satisfy this guy's arbitrary demands. | |
| Feb 4, 2018 at 21:38 | vote | accept | Matt D | ||
| Feb 4, 2018 at 7:42 | history | answered | Icyfire | CC BY-SA 3.0 |