Skip to main content
Commonmark migration
Source Link

#No the Couatl cannot gain Spellcasting using Change Shape

No the Couatl cannot gain Spellcasting using Change Shape

[The Couatl] gains any Statistics and capabilities (except Class Features, legendary actions, and lair actions) that the new form has but that it lacks.

###Spellcasting is a class feature, even for monsters

Spellcasting is a class feature, even for monsters

According to the introduction to the Monster Manual:

A monster with the Spellcasting class feature has a spellcaster level and spell slots, which it uses to cast its spells of 1st level and higher...

The monster has a list of spells known or prepared from a particular class. [...] The monster is considered a member of that class when attuning to or using a magic item that requires membership in the class or access to its spell list.

So the rules say that Spellcasting is a class feature even with monsters. In fact, the association with a class seems to be the distinguishing difference between Spellcasting and Innate Spellcasting (and there is indeed a difference). In this case, the Hobgoblin Devastator is considered to be a member of the Wizard class even though it doesn't say Wizard anywhere on it stat block.

This has been clarified and confirmed by Jeremy Crawford:

The Spellcasting trait in monsters is associated with a class, as explained in the introduction to the Monster Manual. That's a class feature.

Because Spellcasting is a class feature, the Couatl will not get this ability when it uses Change Shape to turn into a Hobgoblin Devestator.

#No the Couatl cannot gain Spellcasting using Change Shape

[The Couatl] gains any Statistics and capabilities (except Class Features, legendary actions, and lair actions) that the new form has but that it lacks.

###Spellcasting is a class feature, even for monsters

According to the introduction to the Monster Manual:

A monster with the Spellcasting class feature has a spellcaster level and spell slots, which it uses to cast its spells of 1st level and higher...

The monster has a list of spells known or prepared from a particular class. [...] The monster is considered a member of that class when attuning to or using a magic item that requires membership in the class or access to its spell list.

So the rules say that Spellcasting is a class feature even with monsters. In fact, the association with a class seems to be the distinguishing difference between Spellcasting and Innate Spellcasting (and there is indeed a difference). In this case, the Hobgoblin Devastator is considered to be a member of the Wizard class even though it doesn't say Wizard anywhere on it stat block.

This has been clarified and confirmed by Jeremy Crawford:

The Spellcasting trait in monsters is associated with a class, as explained in the introduction to the Monster Manual. That's a class feature.

Because Spellcasting is a class feature, the Couatl will not get this ability when it uses Change Shape to turn into a Hobgoblin Devestator.

No the Couatl cannot gain Spellcasting using Change Shape

[The Couatl] gains any Statistics and capabilities (except Class Features, legendary actions, and lair actions) that the new form has but that it lacks.

Spellcasting is a class feature, even for monsters

According to the introduction to the Monster Manual:

A monster with the Spellcasting class feature has a spellcaster level and spell slots, which it uses to cast its spells of 1st level and higher...

The monster has a list of spells known or prepared from a particular class. [...] The monster is considered a member of that class when attuning to or using a magic item that requires membership in the class or access to its spell list.

So the rules say that Spellcasting is a class feature even with monsters. In fact, the association with a class seems to be the distinguishing difference between Spellcasting and Innate Spellcasting (and there is indeed a difference). In this case, the Hobgoblin Devastator is considered to be a member of the Wizard class even though it doesn't say Wizard anywhere on it stat block.

This has been clarified and confirmed by Jeremy Crawford:

The Spellcasting trait in monsters is associated with a class, as explained in the introduction to the Monster Manual. That's a class feature.

Because Spellcasting is a class feature, the Couatl will not get this ability when it uses Change Shape to turn into a Hobgoblin Devestator.

added 14 characters in body
Source Link
Rubiksmoose
  • 95.6k
  • 21
  • 486
  • 580

#No the Couatl cannot gain Spellcasting using Change Shape

[The Couatl] gains any Statistics and capabilities (except Class Features, legendary actions, and lair actions) that the new form has but that it lacks.

###Spellcasting is a class feature, even for monsters

According to the introduction to the Monster Manual:

A monster with the Spellcasting class feature has a spellcaster level and spell slots, which it uses to cast its spells of 1st level and higher...

The monster has a list of spells known or prepared from a particular class. [...] The monster is considered a member of that class when attuning to or using a magic item that requires membership in the class or access to its spell list.

So the rules say that Spellcasting is a class feature even with monsters. In fact, the association with a class seems to be the distinguishing difference between Spellcasting and Innate Spellcasting (and there is indeed a difference). In this case, the CouatlHobgoblin Devastator is considered to be a member of the Wizard class even though it doesn't say Wizard anywhere on it stat block.

This has been clarified and confirmed by Jeremy Crawford:

The Spellcasting trait in monsters is associated with a class, as explained in the introduction to the Monster Manual. That's a class feature.

Because Spellcasting is a class feature, the Couatl will not get this ability when it uses Change Shape to turn into a Hobgoblin Devestator.

#No the Couatl cannot gain Spellcasting using Change Shape

[The Couatl] gains any Statistics and capabilities (except Class Features, legendary actions, and lair actions) that the new form has but that it lacks.

###Spellcasting is a class feature, even for monsters

According to the introduction to the Monster Manual:

A monster with the Spellcasting class feature has a spellcaster level and spell slots, which it uses to cast its spells of 1st level and higher...

The monster has a list of spells known or prepared from a particular class. [...] The monster is considered a member of that class when attuning to or using a magic item that requires membership in the class or access to its spell list.

So the rules say that Spellcasting is a class feature even with monsters. In fact, the association with a class seems to be the distinguishing difference between Spellcasting and Innate Spellcasting (and there is indeed a difference). In this case, the Couatl is considered to be a member of the Wizard class even though it doesn't say Wizard anywhere on it stat block.

This has been clarified and confirmed by Jeremy Crawford:

The Spellcasting trait in monsters is associated with a class, as explained in the introduction to the Monster Manual. That's a class feature.

Because Spellcasting is a class feature, the Couatl will not get this ability when it uses Change Shape to turn into a Hobgoblin Devestator.

#No the Couatl cannot gain Spellcasting using Change Shape

[The Couatl] gains any Statistics and capabilities (except Class Features, legendary actions, and lair actions) that the new form has but that it lacks.

###Spellcasting is a class feature, even for monsters

According to the introduction to the Monster Manual:

A monster with the Spellcasting class feature has a spellcaster level and spell slots, which it uses to cast its spells of 1st level and higher...

The monster has a list of spells known or prepared from a particular class. [...] The monster is considered a member of that class when attuning to or using a magic item that requires membership in the class or access to its spell list.

So the rules say that Spellcasting is a class feature even with monsters. In fact, the association with a class seems to be the distinguishing difference between Spellcasting and Innate Spellcasting (and there is indeed a difference). In this case, the Hobgoblin Devastator is considered to be a member of the Wizard class even though it doesn't say Wizard anywhere on it stat block.

This has been clarified and confirmed by Jeremy Crawford:

The Spellcasting trait in monsters is associated with a class, as explained in the introduction to the Monster Manual. That's a class feature.

Because Spellcasting is a class feature, the Couatl will not get this ability when it uses Change Shape to turn into a Hobgoblin Devestator.

added 60 characters in body
Source Link
Rubiksmoose
  • 95.6k
  • 21
  • 486
  • 580

#No the Couatl cannot gain Spellcasting using Change Shape

[The Couatl] gains any Statistics and capabilities (except Class Features, legendary actions, and lair actions) that the new form has but that it lacks.

###Spellcasting is a class feature, even for monsters

According to the introduction to the Monster Manual:

A monster with the Spellcasting class feature has a spellcaster level and spell slots, which it uses to cast its spells of 1st level and higher...

The monster has a list of spells known or prepared from a particular class. [...] The monster is considered a member of that class when attuning to or using a magic item that requires membership in the class or access to its spell list.

So the rules say that Spellcasting is a class feature even with monsters. In this case, the Couatl is considered to be a member of the Wizard class. In fact, the association with a class seems to be the distinguishing difference between Spellcasting and Innate Spellcasting (and there is indeed a difference). In this case, the Couatl is considered to be a member of the Wizard class even though it doesn't say Wizard anywhere on it stat block.

This has been clarified and confirmed by Jeremy Crawford:

The Spellcasting trait in monsters is associated with a class, as explained in the introduction to the Monster Manual. That's a class feature.

Because Spellcasting is a class feature, the Couatl will not get this ability when it uses Change Shape to turn into a Hobgoblin Devestator.

#No the Couatl cannot gain Spellcasting using Change Shape

[The Couatl] gains any Statistics and capabilities (except Class Features, legendary actions, and lair actions) that the new form has but that it lacks.

###Spellcasting is a class feature, even for monsters

According to the introduction to the Monster Manual:

A monster with the Spellcasting class feature has a spellcaster level and spell slots, which it uses to cast its spells of 1st level and higher...

The monster has a list of spells known or prepared from a particular class. [...] The monster is considered a member of that class when attuning to or using a magic item that requires membership in the class or access to its spell list.

So the rules say that Spellcasting is a class feature even with monsters. In this case, the Couatl is considered to be a member of the Wizard class. In fact, the association with a class seems to be the distinguishing difference between Spellcasting and Innate Spellcasting (and there is indeed a difference).

This has been clarified and confirmed by Jeremy Crawford:

The Spellcasting trait in monsters is associated with a class, as explained in the introduction to the Monster Manual. That's a class feature.

Because Spellcasting is a class feature, the Couatl will not get this ability when it uses Change Shape to turn into a Hobgoblin Devestator.

#No the Couatl cannot gain Spellcasting using Change Shape

[The Couatl] gains any Statistics and capabilities (except Class Features, legendary actions, and lair actions) that the new form has but that it lacks.

###Spellcasting is a class feature, even for monsters

According to the introduction to the Monster Manual:

A monster with the Spellcasting class feature has a spellcaster level and spell slots, which it uses to cast its spells of 1st level and higher...

The monster has a list of spells known or prepared from a particular class. [...] The monster is considered a member of that class when attuning to or using a magic item that requires membership in the class or access to its spell list.

So the rules say that Spellcasting is a class feature even with monsters. In fact, the association with a class seems to be the distinguishing difference between Spellcasting and Innate Spellcasting (and there is indeed a difference). In this case, the Couatl is considered to be a member of the Wizard class even though it doesn't say Wizard anywhere on it stat block.

This has been clarified and confirmed by Jeremy Crawford:

The Spellcasting trait in monsters is associated with a class, as explained in the introduction to the Monster Manual. That's a class feature.

Because Spellcasting is a class feature, the Couatl will not get this ability when it uses Change Shape to turn into a Hobgoblin Devestator.

added 2 characters in body
Source Link
Rubiksmoose
  • 95.6k
  • 21
  • 486
  • 580
Loading
added 4 characters in body
Source Link
Rubiksmoose
  • 95.6k
  • 21
  • 486
  • 580
Loading
deleted 13 characters in body
Source Link
Rubiksmoose
  • 95.6k
  • 21
  • 486
  • 580
Loading
added 1 character in body
Source Link
Rubiksmoose
  • 95.6k
  • 21
  • 486
  • 580
Loading
Source Link
Rubiksmoose
  • 95.6k
  • 21
  • 486
  • 580
Loading