Timeline for Does the Fireball spell ignore total cover?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2023 at 14:45 | comment | added | Alan Régis | From a pragmatic point of view, i think this would overcomplicate things... Players could argue that "the wall has cracks and gaps that the fireball would penetrate", or "the fire spreads through the mouth, noses and God knows which other Froghemoth holes". A total cover should be considered as "sealed" for that purpose, in my opinion. | |
| Oct 18, 2021 at 18:59 | comment | added | Michael Shopsin | Yeah, the 1E/2E fireball was very bad in dungeons as it usually filled all the corridors including the part with you in it. | |
| Jul 25, 2018 at 21:12 | comment | added | Pyrotechnical | I think you are flirting with a potentially correct answer, but you've included so much unrelated mathematics and physics into an answer mostly focused on whether or not elves can throw fireballs in the woods and hit eachother behind those trees that the elves and fireballs are being lost in the arithmetic. I think you can improve this answer substantially by excising the math and just focusing on the relevant sections from the rulebook and appropriate comparisons (i.e. if water could get to you, then the fireball will). | |
| Jun 29, 2018 at 17:13 | review | Late answers | |||
| Jun 29, 2018 at 17:27 | |||||
| Jun 29, 2018 at 16:54 | history | answered | user45484 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |