Timeline for What constitutes the most protective degree of cover?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 2018 at 12:31 | comment | added | Pyrotechnical | @IsaacReefman sometimes rocks fall and people accidentally click the downvote in the haste to escape. | |
| Jul 26, 2018 at 7:51 | comment | added | Isaac Reefman | Not sure why this answer got downvoted - the point and content of it is what's answering the actual point (though not the specific example, as it turns out that example isn't a good one in this case) of the question. It boils down to something in Blake Steel's Answer - If total cover is not being protective, it is not the most protective degree of cover. | |
| Jul 25, 2018 at 21:28 | comment | added | V2Blast | As I said as a comment on the question itself - Non-total cover doesn't help against Fireball either, per Jeremy Crawford: "Your cover is foiled if an effect spreads around it and reaches you." | |
| Jul 25, 2018 at 21:04 | history | answered | Pyrotechnical | CC BY-SA 4.0 |