Timeline for Passing a bow from 1 hand to another and making a bonus-action attack
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2020 at 10:23 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Aug 30, 2018 at 5:26 | comment | added | V2Blast | The answer to this related question should hopefully clear things up about how Two-Weapon Fighting works with the Extra Attack feature: Dual Wielding and Extra Attacks | |
| Aug 30, 2018 at 5:13 | history | edited | V2Blast | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added clarification
|
| Aug 30, 2018 at 5:11 | comment | added | V2Blast | I've tried clearing up the wording in your answer a bit. However, to clarify: you do need to use two different one-handed (light) weapons to use Two-Weapon Fighting; you couldn't use the same dagger for all your attacks if you do use TWF. You can make any set of attacks for your Attack action, but at least one needs to be with a light weapon for TWF - you can then use a different one-handed light weapon from that one in your other hand to make your bonus-action attack. (You could even attack once with each dagger as your Attack action, and then use either dagger to do the bonus attack.) | |
| Aug 30, 2018 at 5:06 | history | edited | V2Blast | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
clarified wording; added DNDBeyond links
|
| Aug 30, 2018 at 5:03 | comment | added | Dustin | I'm sorry that including the disqualifying case interpretation in the initial question may have muddied the waters. I will try to keep future questions to affirmative of negative dispositions. | |
| Aug 30, 2018 at 4:59 | comment | added | V2Blast | I'm just pointing out that your question says this: "Would this be permitted since moving the bow from 1 hand to the other is not stowing or drawing it would I therefore still have the free item interaction available to perform this act? Or would the passing between hands effectively count as my free item interaction meaning that I would need to use a full action to draw the dagger on the same turn?" ...So, rather than just saying "The answer is no", it would be clearer to say something like "This situation is not possible, due to the Two-Weapon Fighting rules". | |
| Aug 30, 2018 at 4:57 | comment | added | Dustin | @V2Blast My question above is specifically in the case of a bow on the attack action, in the answer here my response as No is relative to that question. I added the second case to clarify where the primary intent of the question (another attack) would be allowed. | |
| Aug 30, 2018 at 4:17 | comment | added | V2Blast | You've asked two opposing questions ("Is it X? Or is it Y?"), so it's not immediately clear what you mean by "no"... | |
| Aug 30, 2018 at 2:24 | history | answered | Dustin | CC BY-SA 4.0 |