Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Nov 7, 2018 at 13:40 vote accept Freefly
Nov 7, 2018 at 0:07 history edited Darth Pseudonym CC BY-SA 4.0
added 2 characters in body
Nov 6, 2018 at 22:04 comment added user47897 I think that maybe the 'specific beats general' doesn't make sense in terms of rarer conditions overcoming less rare conditions. Rarity has nothing to do with specificity. You woudn't say that a panda is a more specific animal than a racoon, for example, just because it's rarer.
Nov 6, 2018 at 21:25 comment added Darth Pseudonym @Tezra You might be interested in the new question I just posted. rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/135076/…
Nov 6, 2018 at 21:17 comment added Tezra I think "spells do what they say they do" should mean spell trumps non-magic. Otherwise, this is like saying I can't cast fly on a target with clipped wings because the effect of clipped wings is "the creature can no longer fly".
Nov 6, 2018 at 14:33 comment added Mindwin Remember Monica WoTC is doing a wonderful job of shaping Dungeons the Gathering little by little. The active player has control over the effect stack now.
Nov 6, 2018 at 13:49 comment added XAQT78 The “intent” of the Sculpt Spell is to control the area of effect from the spell to spare an ally from most of the damage. As well as the Xanathar reference and Slagmoth comment are compelling enough to save your barbarian.
Nov 6, 2018 at 13:26 comment added Slagmoth Specificity would agree with you... most creatures can have the condition of Paralysis placed upon them but much fewer, in theory, would be able to use Sculpt Spell. Specific beats general.
Nov 6, 2018 at 13:00 history answered Darth Pseudonym CC BY-SA 4.0