Timeline for Does poking yourself with a needle with the intent to do damage require the Attack action, or can it be done as a (free) object interaction?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2020 at 10:23 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Nov 8, 2019 at 3:49 | history | edited | V2Blast | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
fixed header formatting (for accessibility)
|
| Nov 7, 2019 at 19:05 | comment | added | Rubiksmoose | I would 100% drop the needle IRL. | |
| Nov 7, 2019 at 18:56 | comment | added | NotArch | There is also the concern that in D&D there are no givens. There are no kill shots, there are no automatic hits. Heck, even a paralyzed creature that isn't moving still requires an attack roll. Or you can simply flub your attempt. It happens, we're not perfect creatures. | |
| Nov 7, 2019 at 18:55 | comment | added | Catar4 | I do agree, subjectively I believe that it goes against the "flavor" of the class. And it is not something done for the "rule of cool", it is done purely to exploit a class feature to get more out of it. | |
| Nov 7, 2019 at 18:54 | history | edited | Catar4 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 150 characters in body
|
| Nov 7, 2019 at 18:53 | history | edited | Rubiksmoose | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 3 characters in body
|
| Nov 7, 2019 at 18:53 | comment | added | Mark Wells | I think you've found the real issue here: asking "can I do this cheap zero-risk thing in order to maintain my rage?" is un-barbaric. | |
| Nov 7, 2019 at 18:47 | history | answered | Catar4 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |