Timeline for Do sustained spells need constant line-of-sight, or just for the casting?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2021 at 16:44 | comment | added | Newbyte | Does this apply to sr5 as well? | |
| Dec 1, 2012 at 2:01 | comment | added | Cristol.GdM | @Felipe As far as I understand it, they would be affected as long as it's an Indirect spell | |
| Dec 1, 2012 at 1:53 | history | edited | Cristol.GdM | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 3 characters in body
|
| Dec 1, 2012 at 1:52 | comment | added | Cristol.GdM | @Clockwork-Muse Yes, only when moving it around, I will make the wording clearer | |
| Nov 30, 2012 at 21:59 | comment | added | Felipe | In the same line of though as +Clockwork-Muse, What happens if you are already sustaining an area-effect spell and new targets enter it, but you don't see them? | |
| Nov 30, 2012 at 21:55 | comment | added | Clockwork-Muse | The wording on area-effect implies that it's only moving it to the new destination that requires line-of-sight to be maintained, not that the caster must keep the (current) destination in sight. Is that correct? | |
| Nov 30, 2012 at 21:41 | vote | accept | Felipe | ||
| Nov 30, 2012 at 21:33 | history | answered | Cristol.GdM | CC BY-SA 3.0 |