This question has been asked here before the OGL scandal and I've seen the answers. From what I understood the OGL had an agreement in place to not name any intellectual property like spell names in supplements using the attached SRD.

Now, with the SRD being under Creative Commons and the OGL no longer being attached to it, am I legally allowed to name a spell that is in another book like Tasha's Cauldron of Everything?

For example, if I mention that "The 'Synaptic Static' spell would have a special effect on this magic item if it's cast on it", would that be in breach of Copyright/Trademark law or is it fine to simply name the spells?

This question has been asked here before the OGL scandal and I've seen the answers. From what I understood the, OGL had an agreement in place to not name any intellectual property, like spell names in supplements using the attached SRD.

Now, with the SRD being under Creative Commons and the OGL no longer being attached to it, am I legally allowed to name a spell that is in another book like Tasha's Cauldron of Everything?

For example, if I mention that "The 'Synaptic Static' spell would have a special effect on this magic item if it's cast on it", would that be in breach of Copyright/Trademark law or is it fine to simply name the spells?

This question has been asked here before the OGL scandal and I've seen the answers. From what i understood the OGL had an agreement in place to not name any intellectual property like spell names in supplements using the attached SRD.

Now with the SRD being under creative commons and the OGL no longer being attached to it. Am I legally allowed to name a spell that is in another book like Tasha's Cauldron of Everything?

For an example if I mention that "The 'Synaptic Static' spell would have a special effect on this magic item if it's cast on it", would that be in breach of Copyright/Trademark law or is it fine to simply name the spells?

This question has been asked here before the OGL scandal and I've seen the answers. From what I understood the OGL had an agreement in place to not name any intellectual property like spell names in supplements using the attached SRD.

Now, with the SRD being under Creative Commons and the OGL no longer being attached to it, am I legally allowed to name a spell that is in another book like Tasha's Cauldron of Everything?

For example, if I mention that "The 'Synaptic Static' spell would have a special effect on this magic item if it's cast on it", would that be in breach of Copyright/Trademark law or is it fine to simply name the spells?

This question has been asked here before the OGL scandal and I've seen the answers. From what i understood the OGL had an agreement in place to not name any intellectual property like spell names in supplements using the attached SRD.

Now with the SRD being under creative commons and the OGL no longer being attached to it. Am I legally allowed to name a spell that is in another book like Tasha's Cauldron of Everything?

For an example if I mention that "The 'Synaptic Static' spell would have a special effect on this magic item if it's cast on it", would that be in breach of Copyright/Trademark law or is it fine to simply name the spells?

I'm not good at the legal part of all this and would really appreciate if someone had an answer.

This question has been asked here before the OGL scandal and I've seen the answers. From what i understood the OGL had an agreement in place to not name any intellectual property like spell names in supplements using the attached SRD.

Now with the SRD being under creative commons and the OGL no longer being attached to it. Am I legally allowed to name a spell that is in another book like Tasha's Cauldron of Everything?

For an example if I mention that "The 'Synaptic Static' spell would have a special effect on this magic item if it's cast on it", would that be in breach of Copyright/Trademark law or is it fine to simply name the spells?