Timeline for With the new Creative Commons SRD and the OGL no longer applying, can I name spells from Tasha's Cauldron in my supplement book?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2023 at 2:17 | vote | accept | Lerosnn | ||
| Apr 27, 2023 at 23:27 | history | edited | Mołot | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 510 characters in body
|
| Apr 27, 2023 at 20:46 | history | edited | Mołot | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 222 characters in body
|
| Apr 27, 2023 at 20:43 | comment | added | Mołot | @KRyan it is mentioned. I covered it under "freedoms guaranteed to you by your national copyright and trademark laws". Without knowing where OP is located and where he wants to publish, it's hard to be more precise than that. | |
| Apr 27, 2023 at 17:45 | comment | added | Lerosnn | Thank you for the answer! i suppose i was more curious about things like what KRyan said. Would mentioning a name of a spell without describing it be in violation of this. I understand it's not a simple question but if you got any ideas i'd appreciate it | |
| Apr 27, 2023 at 16:36 | comment | added | KRyan | Nominal use, without requiring any permission, is a thing. I don’t know the rules for it or if it applies in this case, but this answer feels incomplete without addressing it. | |
| Apr 27, 2023 at 14:05 | history | answered | Mołot | CC BY-SA 4.0 |