Timeline for Unarmed strike as secondary attack?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12 at 20:11 | comment | added | Terry Windwalker | @HeyICanChan Answers are to clarify what exactly an unarmed strike is and what does it do in practice. So as KRyan explained, while it is "considered manufactured and natural weapon", it is neither and it has its own rules. I was trying to optimize an unarmed fighter with my PC and came up with issues about what exactly it can do. | |
| Feb 12 at 18:18 | vote | accept | Terry Windwalker | ||
| Feb 12 at 14:52 | answer | added | KRyan | timeline score: 3 | |
| Feb 12 at 13:56 | comment | added | Hey I Can Chan | Does any published monk use the attack routine that this question speculates that a monk might have? Or is that unimportant; this a purely a speculative, textual analysis question; and answers are to shed light on unclear rules? | |
| Feb 12 at 13:16 | comment | added | Terry Windwalker | @fectin What I am asking is, for a monk, is it possible to use unarmed strike with multiple attacks (via high BAB) as the secondary attack in their attack sequence, while already being able to do multiple attacks in their original attack sequence? | |
| Feb 12 at 12:25 | comment | added | fectin | It's not clear to me what you are actually asking here. | |
| Feb 12 at 8:23 | history | edited | Terry Windwalker | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 1537 characters in body
|
| Feb 12 at 7:27 | history | edited | Terry Windwalker | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 377 characters in body
|
| Feb 12 at 7:16 | history | edited | Terry Windwalker | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Remove irrelevant description.
|
| Feb 12 at 7:08 | history | asked | Terry Windwalker | CC BY-SA 4.0 |