Yes
I initially thought no, assuming some It seems that Wizards has published errata would exist, but after looking for some and not finding any I'm changing my answer to yes.
I've included the original text frompower in question, Weapon of the books belowGods, and I don't see anybut it is only visible for DDI subscribers. The official errata published for the powernon-subscribers does not include these changes, as can be seen in the currentrelevant PDFs: Player's Handbook Errata PDF on Wizards' site, or the feature in the current Divine Power Errata PDF.
OneMy playgroup has no DDI subscribers in it, so it only makes sense for us to ignore these sort of thechanges. Therefore, this question will have two answers, depending on this page claims some errata exists for the power which would make this answer a clear 'No'.if you care about DDI or not:
Rules-as-WrittenWith DDI, No
Until the end of the encounter, all attacks made with the weapon deal an extratarget deals 1d6 extra radiant damage. When the when used to make a weapon hitsattack. In addition, whenever an enemy, is hit by a weapon attack using the target, that enemy takes a -2 penalty to AC until the end of the weapon wielder's next turn of the target’s wielder.
Contrary to Tobold's answer, nowhere in this effect is theThe key phrase here is "Weapon attack",. The only attacks which would explicitly require the Weapon keyword on the affected attack, but it does say "attacks madeare "Weapon attacks" are ones with the weapon", which is pretty close'Weapon' keyword.
This feature allows you to use a bow, which is a weapon, as an implement. Weapon ofIt does not add the Gods' phrasing says "attacksWeapon keyword to attacks made with the weapon", but thea bow is being used as an implement. Therefore, since these attacks are still not Weapon attacks, Weapon of the Gods would not trigger, even though you are using a weapon to make the attacks. I would say
Without DDI, Yes
The phrasing of Honor the Bow remains the same, but Weapon of the Gods originally read:
Until the end of the encounter, all attacks made with the weapon deal an extra 1d6 radiant damage. When the weapon hits an enemy, the enemy takes a -2 penalty to AC until the end of the weapon wielder's next turn.
Note that technicallythis phrasing does not say "Weapon attacks", givenbut instead "attacks made with the way it's writtenweapon". So, even though your Implement attacks haven't gained the Weapon keyword, you are using a bow, which is still a weapon, and you're makingto make the attack. Therefore, any Implement attacks made with it, sothe bow after targeting it would count.
But, givenwith Weapon of the way other powers work, I would be surprised if that wasGods are "attacks made with the intent,weapon" and if I had a citation for the aforementioned errata ityou would prove this suspicionget the extra benefits.
On the third hand (this is fantasy after all), the text description of the Seldarine Dedicate says "Your weapon is inscribed with sigils and runes, which flare with emerald light when you fire a shot with a whispered prayer". To me, this implies you're supposed to be shooting the bow in a holy fashion, which would imply that instead of just saying a prayer with a holy symbol for your powers, you now shoot holy arrows at things. Furthermore, your lvl 20 Daily says "you launch a fiery bolt from your bow that erupts into white-hot flame where it hits", but is an implement power without the Weapon keyword. Why in the world wouldSo you could instead view all your extra radiant damage from Weapon of the Gods not apply toimplement attacks as bow attacks which actually involve shooting an arrow shot from the bow?or arrows.
So, if it were me, I would ask my DM to allow this combo to work, simplyif only because I think the second and third explanations make more sense than the first. But be up-front about the fact that it mightis not technically be rules-as-writtenRAW with DDI, and that therefore there could possibly be balance issues.
