Skip to main content
added 47 characters in body
Source Link
mxyzplk
  • 175.7k
  • 31
  • 439
  • 662

Yes, as that's what the rule says you can do. If you are having trouble visualizing it, "steam" might help.

You can freely have e.g. flaming and frost enchantments on the same sword - there's no "they cancel each other out" rules anywhere. If you allow it, you figure out how to justify/skin it, but combinations of "opposed" energies are completely rules-legit.

Note also that you're slightly confusing classically opposed elements like fire/water and earth/air with the D&D energies - acid, cold, fire, etc. Fire is both an element and an energy type, while water is only a descriptor and cold are notis a damage type and a descriptor. Water is in the spell descriptors but not the damage type; it's a spell with fire and water descriptors but a damage type of fire.

Yes, as that's what the rule says you can do. If you are having trouble visualizing it, "steam" might help.

You can freely have e.g. flaming and frost enchantments on the same sword - there's no "they cancel each other out" rules anywhere. If you allow it, you figure out how to justify/skin it, but combinations of "opposed" energies are completely rules-legit.

Note also that you're slightly confusing classically opposed elements like fire/water and earth/air with the D&D energies - acid, cold, fire, etc. Fire is both an element and an energy type, while water and cold are not. Water is in the spell descriptors but not the damage type; it's a spell with fire and water descriptors but a damage type of fire.

Yes, as that's what the rule says you can do. If you are having trouble visualizing it, "steam" might help.

You can freely have e.g. flaming and frost enchantments on the same sword - there's no "they cancel each other out" rules anywhere. If you allow it, you figure out how to justify/skin it, but combinations of "opposed" energies are completely rules-legit.

Note also that you're slightly confusing classically opposed elements like fire/water and earth/air with the D&D energies - acid, cold, fire, etc. Fire is both an element and an energy type, while water is only a descriptor and cold is a damage type and a descriptor. Water is in the spell descriptors but not the damage type; it's a spell with fire and water descriptors but a damage type of fire.

added 76 characters in body
Source Link
mxyzplk
  • 175.7k
  • 31
  • 439
  • 662

Yes, as that's what the rule says you can do. If you are having trouble visualizing it, "steam" might help.

You can freely have e.g. flaming and frost enchantments on the same sword - there's no "they cancel each other out" rules anywhere. If you allow it, you figure out how to justify/skin it, but combinations of "opposed" energies are completely rules-legit. (Note

Note also that you're slightly confusing classically opposed elements like fire/water and earth/air with the D&D energies - acid, cold, fire, etc. Fire is both an element and an energy type, while water and cold are not. Water is in the spell descriptors but not the damage type; it's a spell with fire and water descriptors but a damage type of fire.)

Yes, as that's what the rule says you can do. If you are having trouble visualizing it, "steam" might help.

You can freely have e.g. flaming and frost enchantments on the same sword - there's no "they cancel each other out" rules anywhere. If you allow it, you figure out how to justify/skin it, but combinations of "opposed" energies are completely rules-legit. (Note also that you're slightly confusing classically opposed elements like fire/water and earth/air with the D&D energies - acid, cold, fire, etc. Fire is both an element and an energy type, while water and cold are not. Water is in the spell descriptors but not the damage type.)

Yes, as that's what the rule says you can do. If you are having trouble visualizing it, "steam" might help.

You can freely have e.g. flaming and frost enchantments on the same sword - there's no "they cancel each other out" rules anywhere. If you allow it, you figure out how to justify/skin it, but combinations of "opposed" energies are completely rules-legit.

Note also that you're slightly confusing classically opposed elements like fire/water and earth/air with the D&D energies - acid, cold, fire, etc. Fire is both an element and an energy type, while water and cold are not. Water is in the spell descriptors but not the damage type; it's a spell with fire and water descriptors but a damage type of fire.

added 7 characters in body
Source Link
mxyzplk
  • 175.7k
  • 31
  • 439
  • 662

Yes, as that's what the rule says you can do. If you are having trouble visualizing it, "steam" might help.

You can freely have e.g. flaming and frost enchantments on the same sword - there's no "they cancel each other out" rules anywhere. If you allow it, you figure out how to justify/skin it, but combinations of "opposed" energies are completely rules-legit. (Note also that you're slightly confusing classically opposed elements like fire/water and earth/air with the D&D energies - acid, cold, fire, etc. Fire is both an element and an energy type, while water and cold are not. Water is in the spell typedescriptors but not the damage type.)

Yes, as that's what the rule says you can do. If you are having trouble visualizing it, "steam" might help.

You can freely have e.g. flaming and frost enchantments on the same sword - there's no "they cancel each other out" rules anywhere. If you allow it, you figure out how to justify/skin it, but combinations of "opposed" energies are completely rules-legit. (Note also that you're slightly confusing classically opposed elements like fire/water and earth/air with the D&D energies - acid, cold, fire, etc. Fire is both an element and an energy type, while water and cold are not. Water is in the spell type but not the damage type.)

Yes, as that's what the rule says you can do. If you are having trouble visualizing it, "steam" might help.

You can freely have e.g. flaming and frost enchantments on the same sword - there's no "they cancel each other out" rules anywhere. If you allow it, you figure out how to justify/skin it, but combinations of "opposed" energies are completely rules-legit. (Note also that you're slightly confusing classically opposed elements like fire/water and earth/air with the D&D energies - acid, cold, fire, etc. Fire is both an element and an energy type, while water and cold are not. Water is in the spell descriptors but not the damage type.)

added 52 characters in body
Source Link
mxyzplk
  • 175.7k
  • 31
  • 439
  • 662
Loading
added 227 characters in body
Source Link
mxyzplk
  • 175.7k
  • 31
  • 439
  • 662
Loading
Source Link
mxyzplk
  • 175.7k
  • 31
  • 439
  • 662
Loading