Skip to main content
minor copyediting; split into paragraphs for readability; clarified phrasing; fixed quote formatting to match source; added DDB link; edited tags; edited tags
Source Link
V2Blast
  • 50.3k
  • 10
  • 223
  • 306

Can a mount with the trampling charge featureTrampling Charge trait use the bonus action-action attack against prone targets?

I'm here with a rather nitpicky question. 

We all know that when you have a regular mount in 5th edition, you can't make it attack while controlling it.

But
But what happens if the mount could attack as a bonus action, as per the second part of a warhorse's trampling chargewarhorse (DM Basic Rules, p. 48)'s Trampling Charge trait?

The description of the warhorse's Trampling Charge trait says:

Trampling Charge

Trampling Charge. [...]If] If the target is prone, the horse can make another attack with its hooves against it as a bonus action.

So this is where I'm going: We
We have a shield bashing-bashing Paladin whomwho often knocks opponents prone in combat. If I then move towards said prone opponent, could I have my warhorse attack using its bonus action?

The mounted combat rules don't really say: "You can't use bonus actions". All they mention about actions under your control is: "[...] and it has only 3 action options [...]": Dash, Disengage, and Dodge." In every way, this doesn't seem to tell me that if my mount gets a possible bonus action (which might be an attack), it wouldn't be able to perform it under my control.

In the bonus action explanationrules on bonus actions, there is this mention: anything that deprives you of your ability of takingto take actions, also prevents you from makingtaking bonus actions. But I guessI'm guessing this has nothing to do with specific actions and, but rather conditions like paralyzed.

So what do you think? Is itthis legit?

Can a mount with the trampling charge feature use the bonus action attack against prone targets?

I'm here with a rather nitpicky question. We all know that when you have a regular mount in 5th edition you can't make it attack while controlling it.

But what happens if the mount could attack as a bonus action, as per the second part of a warhorse's trampling charge (DM Basic Rules, p. 48)?

Trampling Charge

[...]If the target is prone, the horse can make another attack with its hooves against it as a bonus action.

So this is where I'm going: We have a shield bashing Paladin whom often knocks opponents prone in combat. If I then move towards said prone opponent could I have my warhorse attack using its bonus action?

The mounted combat rules don't really say: "You can't use bonus actions". All they mention about actions under your control is: "[...] and it has only 3 action options [...]". In every way, this doesn't seem to tell me that if my mount gets a possible bonus action (which might be an attack), it wouldn't be able to perform it under my control.

In the bonus action explanation there is this mention: anything that deprives you of your ability of taking actions, also prevents you from making bonus actions. But I guess this has nothing to do with specific actions and rather conditions like paralyzed.

So what do you think? Is it legit?

Can a mount with the Trampling Charge trait use the bonus-action attack against prone targets?

I'm here with a rather nitpicky question. 

We all know that when you have a regular mount in 5th edition, you can't make it attack while controlling it.
But what happens if the mount could attack as a bonus action, as per the second part of a warhorse's Trampling Charge trait?

The description of the warhorse's Trampling Charge trait says:

Trampling Charge. [...] If the target is prone, the horse can make another attack with its hooves against it as a bonus action.

So this is where I'm going:
We have a shield-bashing Paladin who often knocks opponents prone in combat. If I then move towards said prone opponent, could I have my warhorse attack using its bonus action?

The mounted combat rules don't really say: "You can't use bonus actions". All they mention about actions under your control is: "[...] and it has only 3 action options: Dash, Disengage, and Dodge." In every way, this doesn't seem to tell me that if my mount gets a possible bonus action (which might be an attack), it wouldn't be able to perform it under my control.

In the rules on bonus actions, there is this mention: anything that deprives you of your ability to take actions also prevents you from taking bonus actions. But I'm guessing this has nothing to do with specific actions, but rather conditions like paralyzed.

So what do you think? Is this legit?

added links, tags
Source Link
Nobody the Hobgoblin
  • 135.4k
  • 17
  • 393
  • 818

I'm here with a rather nitpicky question. We all know that when you have a regular mount in 5th edition you can't make it attack while controlling it.

But what happens if the mount could attack as a bonus action, as per the second part of trampling chargea warhorse's trampling charge (DM Basic Rules, p. 48)?

Trampling Charge

[...]If the target is prone, the horse can make another attack with its hooves against it as a bonus action.

So this is where I'm going: We have a shield bashing Paladin whom often knocks opponents prone in combat. If I then move towards said prone opponent could I have my warhorse attack using its bonus action?

The mounted combat rulesmounted combat rules don't really say: "You can't use bonus actions". All they mention about actions under your control is: "[...] and it has only 3 action options [...]". In every way, this doesn't seem to tell me that if my mount gets a possible bonus action (which might be an attack), it wouldn't be able to perform it under my control.

In the bonus action explanation there is this mention: anything that deprives you of your ability of taking actions, also prevents you from making bonus actions. But I guess this has nothing to do with specific actions and rather conditions like paralyzed.

So what do you think? Is it legit?

I'm here with a rather nitpicky question. We all know that when you have a regular mount in 5th edition you can't make it attack while controlling it.

But what happens if the mount could attack as a bonus action, as per the second part of trampling charge (DM Basic Rules, p. 48)?

Trampling Charge

[...]If the target is prone, the horse can make another attack with its hooves against it as a bonus action.

So this is where I'm going: We have a shield bashing Paladin whom often knocks opponents prone in combat. If I then move towards said prone opponent could I have my warhorse attack using its bonus action?

The mounted combat rules don't really say: "You can't use bonus actions". All they mention about actions under your control is: "[...] and it has only 3 action options [...]". In every way, this doesn't seem to tell me that if my mount gets a possible bonus action (which might be an attack), it wouldn't be able to perform it under my control.

In the bonus action explanation there is this mention: anything that deprives you of your ability of taking actions, also prevents you from making bonus actions. But I guess this has nothing to do with specific actions and rather conditions like paralyzed.

So what do you think? Is it legit?

I'm here with a rather nitpicky question. We all know that when you have a regular mount in 5th edition you can't make it attack while controlling it.

But what happens if the mount could attack as a bonus action, as per the second part of a warhorse's trampling charge (DM Basic Rules, p. 48)?

Trampling Charge

[...]If the target is prone, the horse can make another attack with its hooves against it as a bonus action.

So this is where I'm going: We have a shield bashing Paladin whom often knocks opponents prone in combat. If I then move towards said prone opponent could I have my warhorse attack using its bonus action?

The mounted combat rules don't really say: "You can't use bonus actions". All they mention about actions under your control is: "[...] and it has only 3 action options [...]". In every way, this doesn't seem to tell me that if my mount gets a possible bonus action (which might be an attack), it wouldn't be able to perform it under my control.

In the bonus action explanation there is this mention: anything that deprives you of your ability of taking actions, also prevents you from making bonus actions. But I guess this has nothing to do with specific actions and rather conditions like paralyzed.

So what do you think? Is it legit?

Commonmark migration
Source Link

I'm here with a rather nitpicky question. We all know that when you have a regular mount in 5th edition you can't make it attack while controlling it.

But what happens if the mount could attack as a bonus action, as per the second part of trampling charge (DM Basic Rules, p. 48)?

Trampling Charge

 

[...]If the target is prone, the horse can make another attack with its hooves against it as a bonus action.

So this is where I'm going: We have a shield bashing Paladin whom often knocks opponents prone in combat. If I then move towards said prone opponent could I have my warhorse attack using its bonus action?

The mounted combat rules don't really say: "You can't use bonus actions". All they mention about actions under your control is: "[...] and it has only 3 action options [...]". In every way, this doesn't seem to tell me that if my mount gets a possible bonus action (which might be an attack), it wouldn't be able to perform it under my control.

In the bonus action explanation there is this mention: anything that deprives you of your ability of taking actions, also prevents you from making bonus actions. But I guess this has nothing to do with specific actions and rather conditions like paralyzed.

So what do you think? Is it legit?

I'm here with a rather nitpicky question. We all know that when you have a regular mount in 5th edition you can't make it attack while controlling it.

But what happens if the mount could attack as a bonus action, as per the second part of trampling charge (DM Basic Rules, p. 48)?

Trampling Charge

 

[...]If the target is prone, the horse can make another attack with its hooves against it as a bonus action.

So this is where I'm going: We have a shield bashing Paladin whom often knocks opponents prone in combat. If I then move towards said prone opponent could I have my warhorse attack using its bonus action?

The mounted combat rules don't really say: "You can't use bonus actions". All they mention about actions under your control is: "[...] and it has only 3 action options [...]". In every way, this doesn't seem to tell me that if my mount gets a possible bonus action (which might be an attack), it wouldn't be able to perform it under my control.

In the bonus action explanation there is this mention: anything that deprives you of your ability of taking actions, also prevents you from making bonus actions. But I guess this has nothing to do with specific actions and rather conditions like paralyzed.

So what do you think? Is it legit?

I'm here with a rather nitpicky question. We all know that when you have a regular mount in 5th edition you can't make it attack while controlling it.

But what happens if the mount could attack as a bonus action, as per the second part of trampling charge (DM Basic Rules, p. 48)?

Trampling Charge

[...]If the target is prone, the horse can make another attack with its hooves against it as a bonus action.

So this is where I'm going: We have a shield bashing Paladin whom often knocks opponents prone in combat. If I then move towards said prone opponent could I have my warhorse attack using its bonus action?

The mounted combat rules don't really say: "You can't use bonus actions". All they mention about actions under your control is: "[...] and it has only 3 action options [...]". In every way, this doesn't seem to tell me that if my mount gets a possible bonus action (which might be an attack), it wouldn't be able to perform it under my control.

In the bonus action explanation there is this mention: anything that deprives you of your ability of taking actions, also prevents you from making bonus actions. But I guess this has nothing to do with specific actions and rather conditions like paralyzed.

So what do you think? Is it legit?

title, quote, tried to make it more concise
Source Link
MrLemon
  • 13.6k
  • 2
  • 53
  • 83
Loading
Source Link
Rutger
  • 131
  • 2
  • 3
Loading